In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in Industrial Augmented Reality (IAR) due to its prominent role in the ongoing revolution known as Industry 4.0. For companies and industries it is essential to evaluate carefully which of the developed AR-based technologies to adopt, and when, for tasks such as training, maintenance, assistance, and collaborative design. There is also a wide array of hardware and software alternatives on the market, characterized by a significant heterogeneity in terms of functionalities, performance and cost. With this work, our objective is to study and compare some widely available devices and Software Development Kits (SDKs) for AR by leveraging a set of evaluation criteria derived from the actual literature which have been deemed capable to qualify the above assets as suitable for industrial applications. Such criteria include the operative range, robustness, accuracy and stability. Both marker-based and marker-less solutions have been considered, in order to investigate a wide range of possible use cases.
Evaluating the suitability of several AR devices and tools for industrial applications / Battegazzorre, Edoardo; Calandra, Davide; Strada, Francesco; Bottino, Andrea; Lamberti, Fabrizio. - STAMPA. - 12243:(2020), pp. 248-267. (Intervento presentato al convegno 7th International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics (AVR 2020) tenutosi a Lecce, Italia nel September 7-10, 2020) [10.1007/978-3-030-58468-9_19].
Evaluating the suitability of several AR devices and tools for industrial applications
Edoardo Battegazzorre;Davide Calandra;Francesco Strada;Andrea Bottino;Fabrizio Lamberti
2020
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in Industrial Augmented Reality (IAR) due to its prominent role in the ongoing revolution known as Industry 4.0. For companies and industries it is essential to evaluate carefully which of the developed AR-based technologies to adopt, and when, for tasks such as training, maintenance, assistance, and collaborative design. There is also a wide array of hardware and software alternatives on the market, characterized by a significant heterogeneity in terms of functionalities, performance and cost. With this work, our objective is to study and compare some widely available devices and Software Development Kits (SDKs) for AR by leveraging a set of evaluation criteria derived from the actual literature which have been deemed capable to qualify the above assets as suitable for industrial applications. Such criteria include the operative range, robustness, accuracy and stability. Both marker-based and marker-less solutions have been considered, in order to investigate a wide range of possible use cases.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Battegazzorre2020_Chapter_EvaluatingTheSuitabilityOfSeve.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
8.02 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.02 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
00_paper.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Post-print author's version
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
5.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2836044