Standard driving cycles have been the method of choice for testing vehicle performance for decades, both in research and at the regulatory level. These methodologies offer the significant advantage of test reproducibility, allowing for consistent comparisons between vehicles. However, their inability to reflect real-world driving conditions has become increasingly evident. This issue was first exacerbated by the advent of hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which introduced new complexities in powertrain operation. Legislators attempted to adapt testing procedures to account for electric energy usage in emissions assessments, but these efforts have largely failed to address the technical challenges posed by modern vehicles. As a result, the gap between real-world fuel consumption and type-approval values has continued to grow. The introduction of ADAS technologies has further widened this discrepancy, as standard driving cycles are no longer capable of accurately representing modern vehicle performance. In light of these challenges, this paper critically evaluates the limitations of standard drive cycles and on-road testing procedures, explores how hybrid and connected vehicles further complicate performance assessment, and proposes directions for improving these methodologies.

Are We Testing Vehicles the Right Way? Challenges of Electrified and Connected Vehicles for Standard Drive Cycles and On-Road Testing / Grano, Elia; Villani, Manfredi; de Carvalho Pinheiro, Henrique; Carello, Massimiliana. - In: WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL. - ISSN 2032-6653. - 16:2(2025). [10.3390/wevj16020094]

Are We Testing Vehicles the Right Way? Challenges of Electrified and Connected Vehicles for Standard Drive Cycles and On-Road Testing

Grano, Elia;de Carvalho Pinheiro, Henrique;Carello, Massimiliana
2025

Abstract

Standard driving cycles have been the method of choice for testing vehicle performance for decades, both in research and at the regulatory level. These methodologies offer the significant advantage of test reproducibility, allowing for consistent comparisons between vehicles. However, their inability to reflect real-world driving conditions has become increasingly evident. This issue was first exacerbated by the advent of hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which introduced new complexities in powertrain operation. Legislators attempted to adapt testing procedures to account for electric energy usage in emissions assessments, but these efforts have largely failed to address the technical challenges posed by modern vehicles. As a result, the gap between real-world fuel consumption and type-approval values has continued to grow. The introduction of ADAS technologies has further widened this discrepancy, as standard driving cycles are no longer capable of accurately representing modern vehicle performance. In light of these challenges, this paper critically evaluates the limitations of standard drive cycles and on-road testing procedures, explores how hybrid and connected vehicles further complicate performance assessment, and proposes directions for improving these methodologies.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
wevj-16-00094.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.87 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2997512
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo