In the vision of Industry 5.0, collaborative robots (or cobots) play a central supporting role in various industries, especially manufacturing. Close interaction with cobots requires special attention to user experience to fully exploit the benefts of this paradigm. Consequently, understanding the impact of a cobot’s physical size on user experience becomes critical to optimizing human–robot collaboration (HRC). This research aims to investigate the relationship between cobot size (UR3e – small cobot vs. UR10e – large cobot) and user experience in HRC contexts, in conjunction with other factors (i.e., cobot movement speed and product assembly complexity). Through a series of controlled experiments involving 32 participants, user experience data were obtained by collecting physiological measures (i.e., electro-dermal activity, heart activity, eyetracking metrics) and subjective responses with questionnaires (i.e., perceived workload, interaction quality, and affective state). Results showed that the large cobot was generally perceived to be safer, more natural, efcient, fuid, and trustworthy. With the large cobot, there was a decrease in dominance; however, it was ofset by the learning efect. Perceived workload was mainly infuenced by product complexity. No clear diference in terms of mental strain emerged from the physiological data comparing the cobot sizes. In addition, the interaction term between cobot size and cobot movement speed never emerged as signifcant. The results of this research can ofer practical insights to improve the efectiveness and acceptance of cobots during the implementation phase.
Does size matter? Exploring the effect of cobot size on user experience in human–robot collaboration / Gervasi, Riccardo; Capponi, Matteo; Mastrogiacomo, Luca; Franceschini, Fiorenzo. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0268-3768. - STAMPA. - 133:11-12(2024), pp. 5777-5791. [10.1007/s00170-024-14060-2]
Does size matter? Exploring the effect of cobot size on user experience in human–robot collaboration
Riccardo Gervasi;Matteo Capponi;Luca Mastrogiacomo;Fiorenzo Franceschini
2024
Abstract
In the vision of Industry 5.0, collaborative robots (or cobots) play a central supporting role in various industries, especially manufacturing. Close interaction with cobots requires special attention to user experience to fully exploit the benefts of this paradigm. Consequently, understanding the impact of a cobot’s physical size on user experience becomes critical to optimizing human–robot collaboration (HRC). This research aims to investigate the relationship between cobot size (UR3e – small cobot vs. UR10e – large cobot) and user experience in HRC contexts, in conjunction with other factors (i.e., cobot movement speed and product assembly complexity). Through a series of controlled experiments involving 32 participants, user experience data were obtained by collecting physiological measures (i.e., electro-dermal activity, heart activity, eyetracking metrics) and subjective responses with questionnaires (i.e., perceived workload, interaction quality, and affective state). Results showed that the large cobot was generally perceived to be safer, more natural, efcient, fuid, and trustworthy. With the large cobot, there was a decrease in dominance; however, it was ofset by the learning efect. Perceived workload was mainly infuenced by product complexity. No clear diference in terms of mental strain emerged from the physiological data comparing the cobot sizes. In addition, the interaction term between cobot size and cobot movement speed never emerged as signifcant. The results of this research can ofer practical insights to improve the efectiveness and acceptance of cobots during the implementation phase.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IJAMT v.133, n.11-12, 2024, pp.5777-5791 Cobot size (RG MC LM FF).pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: IJAMT v.133, n.11-12, 2024, pp.5777-5791 Cobot size
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.4 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.4 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2991562