Surface technology is essential to engineer surface properties by topologically optimised design or machining and finishing treatments. Optical surface topography measuring instruments represent state-of-the-art solution to characterise technological surfaces. Topographies measured by optical instruments are affected by errors (non-measured points and spikes), due to complex interactions between the measurand (the topography) and the instrument, liable of poor measurement quality and biasing characterisation. The literature proposes several approaches to manage measurement errors basing on empirical approaches (thresholding, interpolation) and machine learning modelling. This work compares the methods performances applied to industrially relevant case studies (highly polished and native additive manufacturing surfaces).

Comparison of methods for management of measurement errors in surface topography measurements / Maculotti, Giacomo; Genta, Gianfranco; Quagliotti, Danilo; Hansen, Hans N.; Galetto, Maurizio. - 118:(2023), pp. 1084-1089. (Intervento presentato al convegno 16th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, CIRP ICME 22 tenutosi a Ischia - Naples nel 13-15 July 2022) [10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.186].

Comparison of methods for management of measurement errors in surface topography measurements

Maculotti, Giacomo;Genta, Gianfranco;Quagliotti, Danilo;Galetto, Maurizio
2023

Abstract

Surface technology is essential to engineer surface properties by topologically optimised design or machining and finishing treatments. Optical surface topography measuring instruments represent state-of-the-art solution to characterise technological surfaces. Topographies measured by optical instruments are affected by errors (non-measured points and spikes), due to complex interactions between the measurand (the topography) and the instrument, liable of poor measurement quality and biasing characterisation. The literature proposes several approaches to manage measurement errors basing on empirical approaches (thresholding, interpolation) and machine learning modelling. This work compares the methods performances applied to industrially relevant case studies (highly polished and native additive manufacturing surfaces).
2023
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023_Maculotti_ICME22.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.09 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.09 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2987606