Human–Robot Collaboration (HRC) represents an innovative solution able to enhance quality and adaptability of production processes. However, to fully exploit the benefts of HRC, human factors must be also taken into account. A novel experimental setting involving a repetitive assembly process is presented to investigate the efects of prolonged HRC on user experience and performance. Each participant was involved in two 4-h shifts: a manual assembly setting and a HRC one. The response variables collected in the study included self-reported afective state, perceived body discomfort, perceived workload, physiological signals for stress (i.e., heart rate variability and electrodermal activity), process and product defectiveness. Experimental results showed less upper limb exertion in the HRC setting, emphasizing the contribution of cobots in improving physical ergonomics in repetitive processes. Furthermore, results showed reduced mental efort, stress, and fewer process defects in the HRC setting, highlighting how collaborative robotics can improve process quality by supporting operators from a cognitive point of view in repetitive processes.
Manual assembly and Human–Robot Collaboration in repetitive assembly processes: a structured comparison based on human‑centered performances / Gervasi, Riccardo; Capponi, Matteo; Mastrogiacomo, Luca; Franceschini, Fiorenzo. - STAMPA. - 126:3-4(2023), pp. 1213-1231. [10.1007/s00170-023-11197-4]
Manual assembly and Human–Robot Collaboration in repetitive assembly processes: a structured comparison based on human‑centered performances
Riccardo Gervasi;Matteo Capponi;Luca Mastrogiacomo;Fiorenzo Franceschini
2023
Abstract
Human–Robot Collaboration (HRC) represents an innovative solution able to enhance quality and adaptability of production processes. However, to fully exploit the benefts of HRC, human factors must be also taken into account. A novel experimental setting involving a repetitive assembly process is presented to investigate the efects of prolonged HRC on user experience and performance. Each participant was involved in two 4-h shifts: a manual assembly setting and a HRC one. The response variables collected in the study included self-reported afective state, perceived body discomfort, perceived workload, physiological signals for stress (i.e., heart rate variability and electrodermal activity), process and product defectiveness. Experimental results showed less upper limb exertion in the HRC setting, emphasizing the contribution of cobots in improving physical ergonomics in repetitive processes. Furthermore, results showed reduced mental efort, stress, and fewer process defects in the HRC setting, highlighting how collaborative robotics can improve process quality by supporting operators from a cognitive point of view in repetitive processes.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IJAMT v.126, n.3-4, 2023, pp.1213-1231 Comparing Manual repetitive assembly and HRC (RG MC LM FF).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
6.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2978032