Representing an architectural shape, mediating design/formal/semantic needs, means respecting its specificity according to the purposes with which one operates; therefore, teaching how to represent an architectural shape is a complex operation, especially if this happens in the first year of the degree course in Architecture where the heterogeneity of students' background requires a preliminary definition of a common language. Students are firstly introduced to theoretical geometries which underlie architectural shapes. So, they have to know the basis of Geometry (both Descriptive and Analytical) in order to proceed within these issues. This process requires to underline the two `souls' of architectural shapes: the theoretical and the build one. Moreover, it also leads to investigate two different types of theoretical shapes: the one that lies behind the design idea and the other one which underlies the built. We propose teaching examples focused on reading architectural shapes as a result of intersections of surfaces.
Intersecting Architectural Surfaces Between Graphic and Analytic Representations / Cumino, Caterina; Pavignano, Martino; Zich, Ursula. - STAMPA. - (2021), pp. 723-735. (Intervento presentato al convegno 19th International Conference on Geometry and Graphics nel 2020) [10.1007/978-3-030-63403-2_65].
Intersecting Architectural Surfaces Between Graphic and Analytic Representations
Cumino Caterina;Pavignano Martino;Zich Ursula
2021
Abstract
Representing an architectural shape, mediating design/formal/semantic needs, means respecting its specificity according to the purposes with which one operates; therefore, teaching how to represent an architectural shape is a complex operation, especially if this happens in the first year of the degree course in Architecture where the heterogeneity of students' background requires a preliminary definition of a common language. Students are firstly introduced to theoretical geometries which underlie architectural shapes. So, they have to know the basis of Geometry (both Descriptive and Analytical) in order to proceed within these issues. This process requires to underline the two `souls' of architectural shapes: the theoretical and the build one. Moreover, it also leads to investigate two different types of theoretical shapes: the one that lies behind the design idea and the other one which underlies the built. We propose teaching examples focused on reading architectural shapes as a result of intersections of surfaces.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2021_ICGG_Cumino-Pavignano-Zich paper.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Post-print editoriale
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
20.35 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
20.35 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
075-paper-Cumino-Pavignano-Zich_preprint embargo.pdf
Open Access dal 03/12/2021
Descrizione: accepted manuscript referato senza layout definitivo
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
411.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
411.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2859710