PORTO @ 
Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishThe construction of new major transport infrastructures generates different and conflicting positions. In traditional decision-making processes, actors take decisions following a rigid and hierarchical framework, with the illusion of greater rapidity and lower costs. The technical argumentation is assumed as the most suitable one and different points of view are conceived against the public interest. Consequently, a conflict of polarized positions occurs, difficult to be managed. This paper, using the concepts of “framing” and “boundary object”, tries to redefine the approach conceptually. The different points of view, apparently irreconcilable, are considered useful ground to develop shared decisions. Contrasts, if considered before their radicalization, can be seen as a fertile generation of shared solutions and not as a criticism. The case study of the Brenner HS/HC railway line has been chosen to illustrate this approach.
An approach to manage conflicts in the construction of new transport infrastructures: the case of the Brenner HS/HC railway line / CAVALLARO, FEDERICO; F., Maino. - 181(2014), pp. 503-515. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Environmental Impact II tenutosi a Ancona nel 14-16 May 2014.
| Titolo: | An approach to manage conflicts in the construction of new transport infrastructures: the case of the Brenner HS/HC railway line |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2014 |
| Abstract: | The construction of new major transport infrastructures generates different and conflicting posi...tions. In traditional decision-making processes, actors take decisions following a rigid and hierarchical framework, with the illusion of greater rapidity and lower costs. The technical argumentation is assumed as the most suitable one and different points of view are conceived against the public interest. Consequently, a conflict of polarized positions occurs, difficult to be managed. This paper, using the concepts of “framing” and “boundary object”, tries to redefine the approach conceptually. The different points of view, apparently irreconcilable, are considered useful ground to develop shared decisions. Contrasts, if considered before their radicalization, can be seen as a fertile generation of shared solutions and not as a criticism. The case study of the Brenner HS/HC railway line has been chosen to illustrate this approach. |
| ISBN: | 9781845647629 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014_BREBBIA_Cavallaro_Maino.pdf | 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record | Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2787060
Copyright © 2020