Purpose – In a rather common problem for the Quality Management field, (i) a set of judges express their individual (subjective) judgments about a specific attribute, which is related to some objects of interest, and (ii) these judgments have to be fused into a collective one. This paper develops a new technique where individual judgments – which are expressed in the form of partial preference orderings, including the more/less preferred objects only – are fused into a collective judgment, which is expressed in the form of a ratio scaling of the objects of interest. An application example concerning the design of a civilian aircraft seat is presented. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed technique borrows the architecture and the underlying postulates from the Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment (LCJ), adopting a more user-friendly response mode, which is based on (partial) preference orderings instead of paired-comparison relationships. By aggregating and processing these orderings, an overdefined system of equations can be constructed and solved through the Generalized Least Squares method. Apart from a ratio scaling of the objects of interest, this approach makes it possible to estimate the relevant uncertainty, by propagating the uncertainty of input data. Findings – Preliminary results show the effectiveness of the proposed technique, even when preference orderings are rather “incomplete”, i.e., they include a relatively limited number of objects, with respect to those available. Research limitations/implications – Thanks to the relatively simple and practical response mode, the proposed technique is applicable to a variety of practical contexts, such as telephone and street interviews. Although preliminary results are promising, the technique will be tested in a more organic way, considering several factors (e.g., number of judges, number of objects, degree of completeness of preference orderings, degree of agreement of judges, etc.). Originality/value – Even though the scientific literature includes many techniques that are inspired by the LCJ, the proposed one is characterized by two important novelties: (i) it is based on a more user-friendly response mode and (ii) it allows to obtain a ratio scaling of objects with a relevant uncertainty estimation.

Fusion of partial orderings for decision problems in Quality Management / Franceschini, Fiorenzo; Maisano, DOMENICO AUGUSTO FRANCESCO. - ELETTRONICO. - Proceedings book of the 3rd International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management, 2018:(2018), pp. 126-147. (Intervento presentato al convegno 3rd International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management (ICQEM18) tenutosi a Barcelona, Spain nel 11-13 July 2018).

Fusion of partial orderings for decision problems in Quality Management

Fiorenzo Franceschini;Domenico Maisano
2018

Abstract

Purpose – In a rather common problem for the Quality Management field, (i) a set of judges express their individual (subjective) judgments about a specific attribute, which is related to some objects of interest, and (ii) these judgments have to be fused into a collective one. This paper develops a new technique where individual judgments – which are expressed in the form of partial preference orderings, including the more/less preferred objects only – are fused into a collective judgment, which is expressed in the form of a ratio scaling of the objects of interest. An application example concerning the design of a civilian aircraft seat is presented. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed technique borrows the architecture and the underlying postulates from the Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment (LCJ), adopting a more user-friendly response mode, which is based on (partial) preference orderings instead of paired-comparison relationships. By aggregating and processing these orderings, an overdefined system of equations can be constructed and solved through the Generalized Least Squares method. Apart from a ratio scaling of the objects of interest, this approach makes it possible to estimate the relevant uncertainty, by propagating the uncertainty of input data. Findings – Preliminary results show the effectiveness of the proposed technique, even when preference orderings are rather “incomplete”, i.e., they include a relatively limited number of objects, with respect to those available. Research limitations/implications – Thanks to the relatively simple and practical response mode, the proposed technique is applicable to a variety of practical contexts, such as telephone and street interviews. Although preliminary results are promising, the technique will be tested in a more organic way, considering several factors (e.g., number of judges, number of objects, degree of completeness of preference orderings, degree of agreement of judges, etc.). Originality/value – Even though the scientific literature includes many techniques that are inspired by the LCJ, the proposed one is characterized by two important novelties: (i) it is based on a more user-friendly response mode and (ii) it allows to obtain a ratio scaling of objects with a relevant uncertainty estimation.
2018
978-989-20-8521-0
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FF&DM_ICQEM18.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.61 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.61 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2710839
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo