Additive Manufacturing is under the spotlight as potential disruptive technology, particularly for the production of complex-shaped structural metallic components. However, the actual AM process capabilities present some limitations in achieving the strict part quality requirements imposed by the aerospace and automotive sectors. Therefore, the integration of AM and conventional manufacturing represents an emerging scenario to be investigated. In this paper, a pure machining process and a hybrid production route (based on EBM and finish machining) are compared. The influence of material usage-related factors on costs and energy demand is discussed. The results prove that, despite precise process judgments are case-specific, the proposed methodologies are suitable to provide guidelines for identifying the optimal manufacturing route under multiple design objectives.

Assessment of Cost and Energy Requirements of Electron Beam Melting (EBM) and Machining Processes / Priarone, PAOLO CLAUDIO; Robiglio, Matteo; Ingarao, Giuseppe; Settineri, Luca. - STAMPA. - 68:(2017), pp. 723-735. (Intervento presentato al convegno KES Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2017 tenutosi a Bologna, Italy nel April 26-28, 2017) [10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_68].

Assessment of Cost and Energy Requirements of Electron Beam Melting (EBM) and Machining Processes

PRIARONE, PAOLO CLAUDIO;ROBIGLIO, MATTEO;SETTINERI, Luca
2017

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing is under the spotlight as potential disruptive technology, particularly for the production of complex-shaped structural metallic components. However, the actual AM process capabilities present some limitations in achieving the strict part quality requirements imposed by the aerospace and automotive sectors. Therefore, the integration of AM and conventional manufacturing represents an emerging scenario to be investigated. In this paper, a pure machining process and a hybrid production route (based on EBM and finish machining) are compared. The influence of material usage-related factors on costs and energy demand is discussed. The results prove that, despite precise process judgments are case-specific, the proposed methodologies are suitable to provide guidelines for identifying the optimal manufacturing route under multiple design objectives.
2017
978-3-319-57077-8
978-3-319-57078-5
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2670383
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo