This paper addresses the problem of SAT solver per- formance in IC3, one of the major recent breakthroughs in Model Checking algorithms. Unlike other Bounded and Unbounded Model Checking algorithms, IC3 is characterized by numerous SAT solver queries on small sets of problem clauses. Besides algorithmic issues, the above scenario poses serious performance challenges for SAT solver configuration and tuning. We discuss and compare multiple vs. single solver implementations of IC3, with an incremental solver approach. As well known in other ap- plication fields, finding a good compromise between learning and overhead is key to performance. We address solver cleanup and restart heuristics, as well as clause database minimality, based on on-demand clause loading: transition relation clauses are loaded in solver based on structural dependency and phase analysis. We also compare different solutions for multiple specialized solvers, and we provide an experimental evaluation on benchmarks from the HWMCC suite. Though not finding a clear winner, the work outlines several potential improvements for a portfolio-based verification tool with multiple engines and tunings.
Trading-off Incrementality and Dynamic Restart of Multiple Solvers in IC3 / Cabodi, Gianpiero; A., Mishchenko; Palena, Marco. - ELETTRONICO. - (2013). (Intervento presentato al convegno International Workshop on Design and Implementation of Formal Tools and Systems tenutosi a Portland, OR nel 19 Ottobre 2013).
Trading-off Incrementality and Dynamic Restart of Multiple Solvers in IC3
CABODI, Gianpiero;PALENA, MARCO
2013
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of SAT solver per- formance in IC3, one of the major recent breakthroughs in Model Checking algorithms. Unlike other Bounded and Unbounded Model Checking algorithms, IC3 is characterized by numerous SAT solver queries on small sets of problem clauses. Besides algorithmic issues, the above scenario poses serious performance challenges for SAT solver configuration and tuning. We discuss and compare multiple vs. single solver implementations of IC3, with an incremental solver approach. As well known in other ap- plication fields, finding a good compromise between learning and overhead is key to performance. We address solver cleanup and restart heuristics, as well as clause database minimality, based on on-demand clause loading: transition relation clauses are loaded in solver based on structural dependency and phase analysis. We also compare different solutions for multiple specialized solvers, and we provide an experimental evaluation on benchmarks from the HWMCC suite. Though not finding a clear winner, the work outlines several potential improvements for a portfolio-based verification tool with multiple engines and tunings.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2525497
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo