The aim of this work is to assess and compare the mathematical models of two pneumatic suspension architectures and show how they can converge, after appropriate simplifications, to a general linear form. After making this model dimensionless, it will be used to study, with a transmissibility analysis, the behaviour of a mono-suspension (quarter-car model). Finally, an example of a design process will be shown to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both architectures and to provide the reader with a practical design tool.
A comparison between two pneumatic suspension architectures / Quaglia, Giuseppe; Scopesi, Marco; Franco, Walter. - In: VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS. - ISSN 0042-3114. - STAMPA. - 50:4(2012), pp. 509-526. [10.1080/00423114.2011.602420]
A comparison between two pneumatic suspension architectures
QUAGLIA, Giuseppe;SCOPESI, MARCO;FRANCO, WALTER
2012
Abstract
The aim of this work is to assess and compare the mathematical models of two pneumatic suspension architectures and show how they can converge, after appropriate simplifications, to a general linear form. After making this model dimensionless, it will be used to study, with a transmissibility analysis, the behaviour of a mono-suspension (quarter-car model). Finally, an example of a design process will be shown to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both architectures and to provide the reader with a practical design tool.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2486998.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Borsa DIMEAS
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2486998
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo