Accurate segmentation of the prostate gland in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for the early detection and treatment of prostate cancer. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to interobserver variability. This study evaluates and compares two deep learning models, U-Net and E-Net, for automated prostate segmentation using axial T2-weighted MRI scans. Both models were trained and validated using a five-fold cross-validation approach, and tested on a hold-out dataset. Performance was assessed using metrics such as Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), precision, recall, and surface distance measures. E-Net achieved superior results with a mean DSC of 81.61%, outperforming U-Net’s 77.53%, while also demonstrating significantly lower computational complexity and faster inference times. Despite the performance gap, testing showed statistically significant difference between the models. These findings highlight the potential of lightweight deep learning architectures, particularly E-Net, for accurate and efficient prostate segmentation in clinical settings.
Prostate MRI Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of U-Net and E-Net Deep Learning Models / Centineo, G., Salvaggio, L., Hussain, S.I., Ali, M., Meiburger, K., Molinari, F., Comelli, A.. - 16169:(2026), pp. 299-309. (Workshops and competitions hosted by the 23rd International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, ICIAP 2025 Roma (Ita) 15–19 September 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-11317-7_26].
Prostate MRI Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of U-Net and E-Net Deep Learning Models
Meiburger K.;Molinari F.;
2026
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of the prostate gland in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for the early detection and treatment of prostate cancer. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to interobserver variability. This study evaluates and compares two deep learning models, U-Net and E-Net, for automated prostate segmentation using axial T2-weighted MRI scans. Both models were trained and validated using a five-fold cross-validation approach, and tested on a hold-out dataset. Performance was assessed using metrics such as Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), precision, recall, and surface distance measures. E-Net achieved superior results with a mean DSC of 81.61%, outperforming U-Net’s 77.53%, while also demonstrating significantly lower computational complexity and faster inference times. Despite the performance gap, testing showed statistically significant difference between the models. These findings highlight the potential of lightweight deep learning architectures, particularly E-Net, for accurate and efficient prostate segmentation in clinical settings.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2026_ProstateUNetENet.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
2.57 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.57 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
2026_ProstateUNetENet_accepted.pdf
embargo fino al 02/01/2027
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
578.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
578.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3017197
