Wave energy is emerging as a promising renewable resource. Nonetheless, the levelized cost of energy for current Wave Energy Converters (WECs) still exceeds that of mature technologies like wind and solar. Bridging this gap demands an extensive assessment of possible designs and deployment sites. Therefore, we developed a machine learning (ML) based surrogate model that accelerates WEC performance evaluation. Although the framework is broadly applicable, its effectiveness is demonstrated here on the Pendulum Wave Energy Converter (PEWEC). The surrogate model received the parameters describing single WEC setups as input and outputs the device’s general site-independent power matrix. The surrogate architecture comprised two main components: a classification and a regression algorithm. The first determined whether the parameter combination yielded a feasible device setup, while the latter predicted the site-independent power matrix. For the classifier, we compared the performance of five ML algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Classifier, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Feedforward Neural Network (FNN). Instead, we compared four regression ML algorithms for the regressor: RF, Gaussian Process Regression, Radial Basis Function Neural Network, and FNN. The FNN algorithm showed the best results for the classification and regression task. Lastly, we assessed the performance of the FNN-based surrogate model for WEC performance prediction in four representative deployment sites. Regarding annual productivity, the surrogate achieved relative errors below 7.1% at all four sites, limited the absolute deviation from the reference numerical model to under 2.1 MWh, and cut the computational time per device assessment from 222 s to 0.11 s.
A comparison of machine learning based surrogate models for multi-site performance assessment of wave energy converters / Fontana Crespo, R.N., Giorcelli, F., Pasta, E., Aliberti, A., Bottaccioli, L., Sirigu, S.A., Mattiazzo, G., Patti, E.. - In: SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, GRIDS AND NETWORKS. - ISSN 2352-4677. - ELETTRONICO. - (2026). [10.1016/j.segan.2026.102551]
A comparison of machine learning based surrogate models for multi-site performance assessment of wave energy converters
Fontana Crespo, Rafael Natalio;Giorcelli, Filippo;Pasta, Edoardo;Aliberti, Alessandro;Bottaccioli, Lorenzo;Sirigu, Sergej Antonello;Mattiazzo, Giuliana;Patti, Edoardo
2026
Abstract
Wave energy is emerging as a promising renewable resource. Nonetheless, the levelized cost of energy for current Wave Energy Converters (WECs) still exceeds that of mature technologies like wind and solar. Bridging this gap demands an extensive assessment of possible designs and deployment sites. Therefore, we developed a machine learning (ML) based surrogate model that accelerates WEC performance evaluation. Although the framework is broadly applicable, its effectiveness is demonstrated here on the Pendulum Wave Energy Converter (PEWEC). The surrogate model received the parameters describing single WEC setups as input and outputs the device’s general site-independent power matrix. The surrogate architecture comprised two main components: a classification and a regression algorithm. The first determined whether the parameter combination yielded a feasible device setup, while the latter predicted the site-independent power matrix. For the classifier, we compared the performance of five ML algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Classifier, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Feedforward Neural Network (FNN). Instead, we compared four regression ML algorithms for the regressor: RF, Gaussian Process Regression, Radial Basis Function Neural Network, and FNN. The FNN algorithm showed the best results for the classification and regression task. Lastly, we assessed the performance of the FNN-based surrogate model for WEC performance prediction in four representative deployment sites. Regarding annual productivity, the surrogate achieved relative errors below 7.1% at all four sites, limited the absolute deviation from the reference numerical model to under 2.1 MWh, and cut the computational time per device assessment from 222 s to 0.11 s.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3016552
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
