Discrepancies between the engineering properties of laboratory-optimised and plant-produced asphalt mixtures often undermine the validity of laboratory mix design studies. This may be particularly relevant in the case of innovative or unconventional mixtures, like those containing a great amount of recycled materials like RAP and waste plastics. This paper aims to bridge the gap between laboratory research and practical implementation by comparing lab-produced (LP) and plant-produced (PP) mixes containing 50% RAP and a recycled plastic compound (RPC). Different dosages of RPC were incorporated through the hybrid modification method. For comparison, a reference mixture containing a polymer-modified bitumen (wet modification) was prepared to assess differences between the hybrid and wet modification approaches. The study examined the validation of the laboratory mixing procedure, the effect of several RPC dosages, and the performance of different modification methods by analysing key engineering properties, including volumetric, workability, and mechanical characteristics. Similar stiffness and strength properties observed among all investigated mixtures confirmed the reliability of the mix design study and the adopted laboratory mixing procedure. However, all PP asphalt mixtures exhibited lower workability compared with their LP counterparts. Moreover, hybrid-modified mixtures outperformed the reference wet-modified mixture across all investigated parameters, with no adverse effects observed as the RPC content increased.

Verification of High-RAP Mixtures Including Recycled Plastic Compound: From Lab-to Plant-Production / La Macchia, J.N., Baglieri, O., Dalmazzo, D., Santagata, E.. - ELETTRONICO. - 1:(2026), pp. 526-531. (2nd RILEM International Symposium on Bituminous Materials (ISBM 2026) Padova (Ita) 16-18th June 2026) [10.1007/978-3-032-29857-7_80].

Verification of High-RAP Mixtures Including Recycled Plastic Compound: From Lab-to Plant-Production

Joseph Nicolas La Macchia;Orazio Baglieri;Davide Dalmazzo;Ezio Santagata
2026

Abstract

Discrepancies between the engineering properties of laboratory-optimised and plant-produced asphalt mixtures often undermine the validity of laboratory mix design studies. This may be particularly relevant in the case of innovative or unconventional mixtures, like those containing a great amount of recycled materials like RAP and waste plastics. This paper aims to bridge the gap between laboratory research and practical implementation by comparing lab-produced (LP) and plant-produced (PP) mixes containing 50% RAP and a recycled plastic compound (RPC). Different dosages of RPC were incorporated through the hybrid modification method. For comparison, a reference mixture containing a polymer-modified bitumen (wet modification) was prepared to assess differences between the hybrid and wet modification approaches. The study examined the validation of the laboratory mixing procedure, the effect of several RPC dosages, and the performance of different modification methods by analysing key engineering properties, including volumetric, workability, and mechanical characteristics. Similar stiffness and strength properties observed among all investigated mixtures confirmed the reliability of the mix design study and the adopted laboratory mixing procedure. However, all PP asphalt mixtures exhibited lower workability compared with their LP counterparts. Moreover, hybrid-modified mixtures outperformed the reference wet-modified mixture across all investigated parameters, with no adverse effects observed as the RPC content increased.
2026
9783032298560
9783032298577
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
La_Macchia et al_Verification of high-RAP mixtures.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Manuscript
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 7.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.31 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
ISBM2026_lab_vs_plant_005_revacc.pdf

embargo fino al 09/07/2027

Descrizione: Accepted manuscript
Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 288 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
288 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3014711