In Laser Powder Bed Fusion, a layer-by-layer melting of metal powder takes place and is specifically suited to high-performance applications in advanced technologies using Inconel™ 718. Vickers hardness (HV20) of the samples was measured as an output variable of the machine learning model after the heat treatment and surface polishing. Particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm were proposed to define the relationships between the input and output data. The prediction of hardness was then done using five regression models, such as support vector machine, Gaussian process regression (GPR), single-layer and deep-layer artificial neural networks (ANNs), and random tree (RT). A novel technique, rollback, for optimizing output data increased the accuracy metrics. GPR and ANNs performed best in terms of training results. The rollback process was also implemented on the test results. GPR and ANN displayed the best results, with the highest R2, NSE, and KGE values between 0.97 and 0.99, and the lowest MAPE, MAE, and RMSE on the testing data, which proved them as the best solutions. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Taylor diagram were also used to evaluate model performance.

Novel Analytical and Machine Learning Framework Predicting LPBF Heat Treatment Effects on Inconel™ 718 Hardness / Dehghanpour Abyaneh, Mohsen; Sesana, Raffaella; Javadi, Mohammad Sadegh; Narimani, Parviz; Crachi, Matteo; Caraviello, Antonio. - In: JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE. - ISSN 1059-9495. - ELETTRONICO. - (2026), pp. 1-23. [10.1007/s11665-026-13900-4]

Novel Analytical and Machine Learning Framework Predicting LPBF Heat Treatment Effects on Inconel™ 718 Hardness

Dehghanpour Abyaneh, Mohsen;Sesana, Raffaella;Crachi, Matteo;
2026

Abstract

In Laser Powder Bed Fusion, a layer-by-layer melting of metal powder takes place and is specifically suited to high-performance applications in advanced technologies using Inconel™ 718. Vickers hardness (HV20) of the samples was measured as an output variable of the machine learning model after the heat treatment and surface polishing. Particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm were proposed to define the relationships between the input and output data. The prediction of hardness was then done using five regression models, such as support vector machine, Gaussian process regression (GPR), single-layer and deep-layer artificial neural networks (ANNs), and random tree (RT). A novel technique, rollback, for optimizing output data increased the accuracy metrics. GPR and ANNs performed best in terms of training results. The rollback process was also implemented on the test results. GPR and ANN displayed the best results, with the highest R2, NSE, and KGE values between 0.97 and 0.99, and the lowest MAPE, MAE, and RMSE on the testing data, which proved them as the best solutions. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Taylor diagram were also used to evaluate model performance.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s11665-026-13900-4.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.29 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3010127