In the aftermath of World War II, architectural reconstruction in Europe largely followed two divergent paths: on one hand, the meticulous restoration of lost monuments, often driven by a desire for historical restitution but resulting in questionable authenticity; on the other, the radical modernist rupture, which asserted renewal through formal and ideological disjunction. Kolumba, however, consciously departs from both trajectories diverging from the conventional notion of heritage conservation and avoiding to isolate and musealize each historical layer in a process that aims to make the different strata appreciable. By allowing history to manifest through atmosphere, texture, and light, the project encourages an imaginative and empathetic mode of remembrance, in which visitors are invited not merely to observe the past but to dwell within its traces. As a hybrid construct of adaptive reuse, Kolumba redefines the relationship between the ruin and the new, suggesting that architectural heritage attains vitality not through immutable conservation but through critical transformation and re-inscription. This approach resonates with contemporary theories of critical conservation, in which preservation is understood as a dialogical process, a negotiation between temporal strata, material presence, and cultural meaning. Through this methodology, Zumthor’s architecture transcends the rhetoric of restoration, proposing instead an aesthetic and existential continuity that allows the past to persist as a lived and reinterpreted experience within the contemporary moment.
ARCHITECTURE AS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN MEMORY, MATERIALITY, AND BECOMING. The Kolumba Museum: a living dialogue rather than a static monument / Leoni, Francesco. - In: 4A JOURNAL. - ISSN 3035-2827. - 4:(2025), pp. 174-186.
ARCHITECTURE AS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN MEMORY, MATERIALITY, AND BECOMING. The Kolumba Museum: a living dialogue rather than a static monument
Leoni, Francesco
2025
Abstract
In the aftermath of World War II, architectural reconstruction in Europe largely followed two divergent paths: on one hand, the meticulous restoration of lost monuments, often driven by a desire for historical restitution but resulting in questionable authenticity; on the other, the radical modernist rupture, which asserted renewal through formal and ideological disjunction. Kolumba, however, consciously departs from both trajectories diverging from the conventional notion of heritage conservation and avoiding to isolate and musealize each historical layer in a process that aims to make the different strata appreciable. By allowing history to manifest through atmosphere, texture, and light, the project encourages an imaginative and empathetic mode of remembrance, in which visitors are invited not merely to observe the past but to dwell within its traces. As a hybrid construct of adaptive reuse, Kolumba redefines the relationship between the ruin and the new, suggesting that architectural heritage attains vitality not through immutable conservation but through critical transformation and re-inscription. This approach resonates with contemporary theories of critical conservation, in which preservation is understood as a dialogical process, a negotiation between temporal strata, material presence, and cultural meaning. Through this methodology, Zumthor’s architecture transcends the rhetoric of restoration, proposing instead an aesthetic and existential continuity that allows the past to persist as a lived and reinterpreted experience within the contemporary moment.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025_12_LEONI+F_ARCHITECTURE+AS+A+MEDIATOR.+KOLUMBA+4A+JOURNAL.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
3.43 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.43 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3008947
