Introduction. The most common sequence of gait phases is Heel-contact, Flat-foot contact, Push-off, and Swing (standard “HFPS” cycle). However, alternative sequences, referred to as “atypical” gait cycles (AGC), may also occur [1] and are relevant for evaluating instability and gait efficiency. This study aims to investigate AGC in people with different gait disorders during free daily living activities by employing a newly developed open toolbox for detecting gait phases from Pressure Insole (PI) signals. Methods. PI signals of 70 pathological subjects (from 5 cohorts) and 18 Healthy older Adults (HA), recorded during free-daily-living activities (lasting 2.5 hours) were extracted from the Mobilise-D open database [2]. Gait phases were identified through the PIN2GPI toolbox (https://github.com/Biolab-PoliTO/PIN2GPI) (Figure 1.A). AGC%_norm was computed as the maximum AGC percentage between the left and right sides (i.e., subject-specific “worst side”) normalized by the individual’s total walking time. Results. For each subject, we analyzed 1931±609 (mean±SE) gait cycles in CHF, 1068±113 in COPD, 1267±231 in MS, 1916±399 in PD, 1059±201 in PFF patients, and 2076±246 in HA. Higher AGC%_norm was found in PFF (8.8±4.1 %/min; p<0.001), COPD (1.9±0.2 %/min; p<0.001), and MS (3.7±0.9 %/min; p=0.007) patients compared to HA controls (0.8±0.1 %/min) (Figure 1.B). Discussion. The increased AGC%_norm in specific clinical populations suggests its potential as a quantitative marker of locomotor instability. Notably, this parameter was derived from data collected during unsupervised and free-living activities, underscoring its ecological validity. Its relevance for fall-risk assessment is currently being explored in the ongoing MOVEWISE project [3]. Acknowledgement. This proceeding is part of the project NODES, which has received funding from the MUR – M4C2 1.5 of PNRR funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU (Grant agreement no. ECS00000036) – CUP E13B22000020001.

Atypical gait cycles from pressure insoles in real-life scenarios in people with gait disorders / Leo, N.; Ghislieri, M.; Caruso, M.; Cereatti, A.; Agostini, V.. - In: GAIT & POSTURE. - ISSN 0966-6362. - ELETTRONICO. - 122:(2025). (Intervento presentato al convegno 25th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis (SIAMOC) tenutosi a Cagliari (Ita) nel 1-4 October 2025) [10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.011].

Atypical gait cycles from pressure insoles in real-life scenarios in people with gait disorders

Leo, N.;Ghislieri, M.;Caruso, M.;Cereatti, A.;Agostini, V.
2025

Abstract

Introduction. The most common sequence of gait phases is Heel-contact, Flat-foot contact, Push-off, and Swing (standard “HFPS” cycle). However, alternative sequences, referred to as “atypical” gait cycles (AGC), may also occur [1] and are relevant for evaluating instability and gait efficiency. This study aims to investigate AGC in people with different gait disorders during free daily living activities by employing a newly developed open toolbox for detecting gait phases from Pressure Insole (PI) signals. Methods. PI signals of 70 pathological subjects (from 5 cohorts) and 18 Healthy older Adults (HA), recorded during free-daily-living activities (lasting 2.5 hours) were extracted from the Mobilise-D open database [2]. Gait phases were identified through the PIN2GPI toolbox (https://github.com/Biolab-PoliTO/PIN2GPI) (Figure 1.A). AGC%_norm was computed as the maximum AGC percentage between the left and right sides (i.e., subject-specific “worst side”) normalized by the individual’s total walking time. Results. For each subject, we analyzed 1931±609 (mean±SE) gait cycles in CHF, 1068±113 in COPD, 1267±231 in MS, 1916±399 in PD, 1059±201 in PFF patients, and 2076±246 in HA. Higher AGC%_norm was found in PFF (8.8±4.1 %/min; p<0.001), COPD (1.9±0.2 %/min; p<0.001), and MS (3.7±0.9 %/min; p=0.007) patients compared to HA controls (0.8±0.1 %/min) (Figure 1.B). Discussion. The increased AGC%_norm in specific clinical populations suggests its potential as a quantitative marker of locomotor instability. Notably, this parameter was derived from data collected during unsupervised and free-living activities, underscoring its ecological validity. Its relevance for fall-risk assessment is currently being explored in the ongoing MOVEWISE project [3]. Acknowledgement. This proceeding is part of the project NODES, which has received funding from the MUR – M4C2 1.5 of PNRR funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU (Grant agreement no. ECS00000036) – CUP E13B22000020001.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0966636225006083-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Full-text
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
LEO_N_1.pdf

embargo fino al 18/10/2026

Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 208.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
208.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3004393