Decoding Narratives: Towards a Classification Analysis for Stereotypical Patterns in Italian News Headlines

Media headlines shape our initial interpretation of news, framing narratives that influence societal engagement with political and social issues. Yet, they often rely on sensationalism and bias to capture readers’ attention. In this paper, we aim to uncover distinct patterns in Italian headline composition, examining how language and framing vary across political leanings. We analyze a dataset of daily Italian newspaper articles from two outlets with opposing political perspectives, anonymized as Newspaper A and Newspaper B. Our study encompasses the entire set of news and a subset of topics (n = 8) likely to contain stereotypes or clickbait headlines identified using a Large Language Model. Our methodology combines (1) a lexicometric analysis to identify characteristic words of each newspaper, and (2) the training of an accurate deep learning classifier (F1 = 0.84) to learn specific patterns for categorizing headlines into these two perspectives and leveraging explainability techniques to extract and interpret these patterns. Our analysis reveals distinct tonal differences between the two newspapers: Newspaper A generally adopts a more balanced and nuanced approach, while Newspaper B often favors a more direct and sometimes provocative style, especially regarding topics like immigration and social justice. Additionally, Newspaper B’s headlines tend to be brief and punchy, in contrast to the longer, more detailed ones from Newspaper A. Despite these tonal differences, both outlets exhibit similar stereotypical patterns in their coverage, such as consistently emphasizing nationality and group distinctions in ways that can reinforce social stereotypes. This shared tendency suggests that, although their narrative strategies differ, both outlets could contribute to a broader pattern of stereotype reinforcement.