Decision-making processes concerning investments in building upcycling vs. building reconstruction of the existing stock concern different scales: material/component/system, whole building, urban scale, and civil engineering works and and EC should be considered as hidden components of building value and, thus, internalized into investment decision-making processes under a circular perspective. Therefore, this contribution aims to present the first simulation of a methodological proposal to evaluate two alternative investment projects (a residential building upcycling vs. a reconstruction scenario) by internalizing environmental components in the financial Discounted Cash-flow Analysis (DCFA). From a life cycle perspective, the global cost and the «global benefit» are modeled using the NPV indicator calculation. The results highlight the weight of the environmental cost items from a financial perspective and the capability of environmental input (EE and CO2 emissions) to influence the results, thus orienting investment decisions and public policy-making towards sustainable design.
Building Upcycling vs. Building Reconstruction: a Life Cycle Valuation for investment decisions / Fregonara, Elena; Ferrando, Diego G.. - In: PROCEDIA STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. - ISSN 2452-3216. - ELETTRONICO. - 64:(2024), pp. 1727-1732. [10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.177]
Building Upcycling vs. Building Reconstruction: a Life Cycle Valuation for investment decisions
Elena Fregonara;Diego G. Ferrando
2024
Abstract
Decision-making processes concerning investments in building upcycling vs. building reconstruction of the existing stock concern different scales: material/component/system, whole building, urban scale, and civil engineering works and and EC should be considered as hidden components of building value and, thus, internalized into investment decision-making processes under a circular perspective. Therefore, this contribution aims to present the first simulation of a methodological proposal to evaluate two alternative investment projects (a residential building upcycling vs. a reconstruction scenario) by internalizing environmental components in the financial Discounted Cash-flow Analysis (DCFA). From a life cycle perspective, the global cost and the «global benefit» are modeled using the NPV indicator calculation. The results highlight the weight of the environmental cost items from a financial perspective and the capability of environmental input (EE and CO2 emissions) to influence the results, thus orienting investment decisions and public policy-making towards sustainable design.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Fregonara_Procedia_Structural_Integrity_2024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
396.54 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
396.54 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2995554