For the first time we show that spark plasma sintering can efficiently replace hot pressing for the densification of UHTCMCs, in the present case ZrB2/SiC composites reinforced with continuous carbon fibres. To this purpose, the same materials were first produced by hot pressing as baseline samples and then by spark plasma sintering (SPS) to compare microstructure and basic mechanical properties. A special emphasis was given to the study of interfaces, in case of both coated and uncoated carbon fibres. SPS allowed for faster sintering but required an adjustment of the temperature to avoid fibre degradation compared to hot pressing. With similar porosity levels, we observed a slight decrease of flexural strength (300 vs 470 MPa), and an improvement of fracture toughness (15 vs 10 MPa√m) for SPSed samples. SPS was proved to be an effective method for the consolidation of continuous fibre reinforced UHTC composites.
Is spark plasma sintering suitable for the densification of continuous carbon fibre - UHTCMCs? / Zoli, L.; Vinci, A.; Galizia, P.; Gutierrez-Gonzalez, C. F.; Rivera, S.; Sciti, D.. - In: JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY. - ISSN 0955-2219. - STAMPA. - 40:7(2020), pp. 2597-2603. [10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.12.004]
Is spark plasma sintering suitable for the densification of continuous carbon fibre - UHTCMCs?
Galizia P.;
2020
Abstract
For the first time we show that spark plasma sintering can efficiently replace hot pressing for the densification of UHTCMCs, in the present case ZrB2/SiC composites reinforced with continuous carbon fibres. To this purpose, the same materials were first produced by hot pressing as baseline samples and then by spark plasma sintering (SPS) to compare microstructure and basic mechanical properties. A special emphasis was given to the study of interfaces, in case of both coated and uncoated carbon fibres. SPS allowed for faster sintering but required an adjustment of the temperature to avoid fibre degradation compared to hot pressing. With similar porosity levels, we observed a slight decrease of flexural strength (300 vs 470 MPa), and an improvement of fracture toughness (15 vs 10 MPa√m) for SPSed samples. SPS was proved to be an effective method for the consolidation of continuous fibre reinforced UHTC composites.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0955221919308489-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
6.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
JECS-D-19-01621 R1.pdf
Open Access dal 05/12/2021
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.47 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.47 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2952109