This paper presents a critical review of the most established analytical models for the prediction of the compressive strength of FRP and FRCM-confined masonry columns. In particular, two types of fibres are analysed, i.e. glass and basalt. A wide dataset available in the literature is used for the application of the analytical models and for the development of parametric analyses useful for the critical comparison of FRP vs. FRCM confinement technique and glass vs. basalt fibres to be adopted as reinforcement of masonry substrate. The effects of stiffness and strength of the reinforcement, the number of reinforcing layers, the compressive strength of masonry and the cross-section shape are investigated
Modelling of FRP and FRCM-confined masonry columns: critical review for design and intervention strategies / Monaco, Alessia; D'Anna, Jennifer; Minafò, Giovanni; La Mendola, Lidia. - ELETTRONICO. - 916:(2022), pp. 239-248. (Intervento presentato al convegno Mechanics Of Masonry Structures Strengthened With Composite Materials (MURICO7) tenutosi a On-line nel 24-26 November 2021) [10.4028/p-co6rhs].
Modelling of FRP and FRCM-confined masonry columns: critical review for design and intervention strategies
Monaco, Alessia;
2022
Abstract
This paper presents a critical review of the most established analytical models for the prediction of the compressive strength of FRP and FRCM-confined masonry columns. In particular, two types of fibres are analysed, i.e. glass and basalt. A wide dataset available in the literature is used for the application of the analytical models and for the development of parametric analyses useful for the critical comparison of FRP vs. FRCM confinement technique and glass vs. basalt fibres to be adopted as reinforcement of masonry substrate. The effects of stiffness and strength of the reinforcement, the number of reinforcing layers, the compressive strength of masonry and the cross-section shape are investigatedFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MURICO7_2021_Monaco et al.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
341.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
341.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Monaco et al_2022_KEM.916.239.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
501.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
501.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2950085