Common carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) is a commonly used marker for atherosclerosis and is often computed in carotid ultrasound images. An analysis of different computerized techniques for CIMT measurement and their clinical impacts on the same patient data set is lacking. Here we compared and assessed five computerized CIMT algorithms against three expert analysts’ manual measurements on a data set of 1088 patients from two centers. Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed, and the computerized CIMT values were compared with those manually obtained. The CIMT measurements were used to assess the correlation with clinical parameters, cardiovascular event prediction through a generalized linear model and the Kaplan–Meier hazard ratio. CIMT measurements obtained with a skilled analyst's segmentation and the computerized segmentation were comparable in statistical analyses, suggesting they can be used interchangeably for CIMT quantification and clinical outcome investigation. To facilitate future studies, the entire data set used is made publicly available for the community at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fpv535fss7.1.
Carotid Ultrasound Boundary Study (CUBS): An Open Multicenter Analysis of Computerized Intima–Media Thickness Measurement Systems and Their Clinical Impact / Meiburger, K. M.; Zahnd, G.; Faita, F.; Loizou, C. P.; Carvalho, C.; Steinman, D. A.; Gibello, L.; Bruno, R. M.; Marzola, F.; Clarenbach, R.; Francesconi, M.; Nicolaides, A. N.; Campilho, A.; Ghotbi, R.; Kyriacou, E.; Navab, N.; Griffin, M.; Panayiotou, A. G.; Gherardini, R.; Varetto, G.; Bianchini, E.; Pattichis, C. S.; Ghiadoni, L.; Rouco, J.; Molinari, F.. - In: ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0301-5629. - ELETTRONICO. - 47:8(2021), pp. 2442-2455. [10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.022]
Carotid Ultrasound Boundary Study (CUBS): An Open Multicenter Analysis of Computerized Intima–Media Thickness Measurement Systems and Their Clinical Impact
Meiburger K. M.;Marzola F.;Molinari F.
2021
Abstract
Common carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) is a commonly used marker for atherosclerosis and is often computed in carotid ultrasound images. An analysis of different computerized techniques for CIMT measurement and their clinical impacts on the same patient data set is lacking. Here we compared and assessed five computerized CIMT algorithms against three expert analysts’ manual measurements on a data set of 1088 patients from two centers. Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed, and the computerized CIMT values were compared with those manually obtained. The CIMT measurements were used to assess the correlation with clinical parameters, cardiovascular event prediction through a generalized linear model and the Kaplan–Meier hazard ratio. CIMT measurements obtained with a skilled analyst's segmentation and the computerized segmentation were comparable in statistical analyses, suggesting they can be used interchangeably for CIMT quantification and clinical outcome investigation. To facilitate future studies, the entire data set used is made publicly available for the community at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fpv535fss7.1.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2021_CUBS.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.65 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.65 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Meiburger-Carotid.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.61 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.61 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2914093