The space tug can represent a valid solution to provide transportation capabilities for future space missions. In particular, the tug can be effectively adopted for different applications such as electric orbit raising for commercial satellites and cargo transfer to resupply space infrastructures. The adoption of high-power electric propulsion is a fundamental enabler for these mission scenarios, owing to its advantages in terms of long lifetime, high performance and operational flexibility. However, further investigation should be performed in order to optimize the design of the space tug considering different architecture alternatives. We defined two sets of thruster operative points for a more representative comparison of EPS architecture cases. In particular, we analyzed three aspects: the adoption of a cluster of thrusters vs the monolithic approach; the implementation of a direct drive power supply vs the traditional power processing unit; the selection of krypton propellant vs xenon. The design of the space tug is performed with MAGNETO tool, a software developed in a collaboration between SITAEL and Politecnico di Torino in the framework of an ESA GSTP project. The results are compared by means of the analytical hierarchy process to identify the optimal design solution for the spacecraft design.
EPS architecture analysis for future highpower missions / Paissoni, C. A.; Viola, N.; Andreussi, T.; Kitaeva, A.; Andrenucci, M.. - (2019). (Intervento presentato al convegno AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum and Exposition, 2019 tenutosi a usa nel 2019) [10.2514/6.2019-3813].
EPS architecture analysis for future highpower missions
Paissoni C. A.;Viola N.;
2019
Abstract
The space tug can represent a valid solution to provide transportation capabilities for future space missions. In particular, the tug can be effectively adopted for different applications such as electric orbit raising for commercial satellites and cargo transfer to resupply space infrastructures. The adoption of high-power electric propulsion is a fundamental enabler for these mission scenarios, owing to its advantages in terms of long lifetime, high performance and operational flexibility. However, further investigation should be performed in order to optimize the design of the space tug considering different architecture alternatives. We defined two sets of thruster operative points for a more representative comparison of EPS architecture cases. In particular, we analyzed three aspects: the adoption of a cluster of thrusters vs the monolithic approach; the implementation of a direct drive power supply vs the traditional power processing unit; the selection of krypton propellant vs xenon. The design of the space tug is performed with MAGNETO tool, a software developed in a collaboration between SITAEL and Politecnico di Torino in the framework of an ESA GSTP project. The results are compared by means of the analytical hierarchy process to identify the optimal design solution for the spacecraft design.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JPC2019_EPS architecture analysis for future high-power missions.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.25 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.25 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2837933