PORTO @ 
Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishJoint position error (JPE) is frequently used to assess proprioception in rehabilitation and sport science. During position-reposition tests the subject is asked to replicate a specific target angle (e.g. 30° of knee flexion) for a specific number of times. The aim of this study is to find an effective method to estimate JPE from the joint kinematic signal. Forty healthy subjects were tested to assess knee joint position sense. Three different methods of JPE estimation are described and compared using a hierarchical clustering approach. Overall, the 3 methods showed a high degree of similarity, ranging from 88% to 100%. We concluded that it is preferable to use the more user-independent method, in which the operator does not have to manually place “critical” markers.
Estimation of joint position error / Agostini, Valentina; Rosati, Samanta; Balestra, Gabriella; Trucco, Marco; Visconti, Lorenzo; Knaflitz, Marco. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017), pp. 2474-2477. ((Intervento presentato al convegno 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’17) tenutosi a Jeju, Korea nel July 11-15, 2017.
| Titolo: | Estimation of joint position error |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2017 |
| Abstract: | Joint position error (JPE) is frequently used to assess proprioception in rehabilitation and spo...rt science. During position-reposition tests the subject is asked to replicate a specific target angle (e.g. 30° of knee flexion) for a specific number of times. The aim of this study is to find an effective method to estimate JPE from the joint kinematic signal. Forty healthy subjects were tested to assess knee joint position sense. Three different methods of JPE estimation are described and compared using a hierarchical clustering approach. Overall, the 3 methods showed a high degree of similarity, ranging from 88% to 100%. We concluded that it is preferable to use the more user-independent method, in which the operator does not have to manually place “critical” markers. |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBC17-Estimation_of_JPE .pdf | Versione editoriale | 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript | Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2676665
Copyright © 2021