Repetitive Scenario Design (RSD) is a randomized approach to robust design based on iterating two phases: a standard scenario design phase that uses $N$ scenarios (design samples), followed by randomized feasibility phase that uses $N_o$ test samples on the scenario solution. We give a full and exact probabilistic characterization of the number of iterations required by the RSD approach for returning a solution, as a function of $N$, $N_o$, and of the desired levels of probabilistic robustness in the solution. This novel approach broadens the applicability of the scenario technology, since the user is now presented with a clear tradeoff between the number $N$ of design samples and the ensuing expected number of repetitions required by the RSD algorithm. The plain (one-shot) scenario design becomes just one of the possibilities, sitting at one extreme of the tradeoff curve, in which one insists in finding a solution in a single repetition: this comes at the cost of possibly high $N$. Other possibilities along the tradeoff curve use lower $N$ values, but possibly require more than one repetition.
Repetitive Scenario Design / Calafiore, Giuseppe Carlo. - ELETTRONICO. - (2016), pp. 6228-6233. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control tenutosi a Las Vegas nel December 12-14, 2016) [10.1109/CDC.2016.7799227].
Repetitive Scenario Design
CALAFIORE, Giuseppe Carlo
2016
Abstract
Repetitive Scenario Design (RSD) is a randomized approach to robust design based on iterating two phases: a standard scenario design phase that uses $N$ scenarios (design samples), followed by randomized feasibility phase that uses $N_o$ test samples on the scenario solution. We give a full and exact probabilistic characterization of the number of iterations required by the RSD approach for returning a solution, as a function of $N$, $N_o$, and of the desired levels of probabilistic robustness in the solution. This novel approach broadens the applicability of the scenario technology, since the user is now presented with a clear tradeoff between the number $N$ of design samples and the ensuing expected number of repetitions required by the RSD algorithm. The plain (one-shot) scenario design becomes just one of the possibilities, sitting at one extreme of the tradeoff curve, in which one insists in finding a solution in a single repetition: this comes at the cost of possibly high $N$. Other possibilities along the tradeoff curve use lower $N$ values, but possibly require more than one repetition.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2653047
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo