We perform a benchmarking of three different fiber types and two different implementation of flexible rate transceivers in a fixed-grid reconfigurable transparent optical network scenario. Results are obtained through a Monte Carlo based method called the Statistical Network Assessment Process (SNAP). Using the SNAP framework, we derive the statistics of the average bitrate per lightpath on a Pan European network scenario. We consider the average of such metric as a unique merit parameter to compare the use SMF, PSCF or NZDSF. We also consider two different implementations of elastic transceivers, namely one based on pure PM-M-QAM and the other using Time Division Hybrid Modulation Formats (TDHMF). TDHMF always outperforms PM-M-QAM, of 23% in SMF and PSCF and of 27% in the poorer transmission quality NZDSF. Results show that using flexible PM-M-QAM, PSCF are able to support a capacity increase in terms of average bitrate per LP of 48% with respect to NZDSF, while the improvement granted by SMF is 34%.
A statistical analysis of transparent optical networks comparing merit of fiber types and elastic transceivers / Cantono, Mattia; Gaudino, Roberto; Curri, Vittorio. - ELETTRONICO. - 2016-:(2016), pp. 1-4. (Intervento presentato al convegno 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2016 tenutosi a Trento, Italy nel 10-14 Jul 2016) [10.1109/ICTON.2016.7550511].
A statistical analysis of transparent optical networks comparing merit of fiber types and elastic transceivers
CANTONO, MATTIA;GAUDINO, ROBERTO;CURRI, Vittorio
2016
Abstract
We perform a benchmarking of three different fiber types and two different implementation of flexible rate transceivers in a fixed-grid reconfigurable transparent optical network scenario. Results are obtained through a Monte Carlo based method called the Statistical Network Assessment Process (SNAP). Using the SNAP framework, we derive the statistics of the average bitrate per lightpath on a Pan European network scenario. We consider the average of such metric as a unique merit parameter to compare the use SMF, PSCF or NZDSF. We also consider two different implementations of elastic transceivers, namely one based on pure PM-M-QAM and the other using Time Division Hybrid Modulation Formats (TDHMF). TDHMF always outperforms PM-M-QAM, of 23% in SMF and PSCF and of 27% in the poorer transmission quality NZDSF. Results show that using flexible PM-M-QAM, PSCF are able to support a capacity increase in terms of average bitrate per LP of 48% with respect to NZDSF, while the improvement granted by SMF is 34%.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
cantono_icton_2016_v7.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
533.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
533.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Cantono-Astatistical.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
422.13 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
422.13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2652920
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo