The expression of uncertainty of scattering parameter measurements in vector network analysis is an active research subject, since no full consensus about proper algorithms for such expression has been reached so far. Recently, two software packages have been acquired at INRIM, which allow to perform this task in a metrological framework. In this paper we compare the result of analysis performed by two packages, VNA Tools II and Multiport Measurement Software version 4 (MMS4). Both packages claim to perform uncertainty analyses fully compliant to the Guide of expression of uncertainty in measurement, but following completely different approaches. We organized a comparison by performing, with both packages, analyses of the very same datasets. These have been generated by real measurements on passive standards with a commercial vector network analyzer. Results of the comparison give consistency of the uncertainty analyses performed by the software packages, which can be therefore considered equivalent and mutually validated.

Two different ways in evaluating the uncertainty of S-parameter measurements / Sellone, Marco; Shoaib, Nosherwan; Callegaro, Luca; Brunetti, L.. - (2014), pp. 1087-1092. (Intervento presentato al convegno IMEKO TC-4 Symposium tenutosi a Benevento, Italy nel 15-17/09/2014).

Two different ways in evaluating the uncertainty of S-parameter measurements

SELLONE, MARCO;SHOAIB, NOSHERWAN;
2014

Abstract

The expression of uncertainty of scattering parameter measurements in vector network analysis is an active research subject, since no full consensus about proper algorithms for such expression has been reached so far. Recently, two software packages have been acquired at INRIM, which allow to perform this task in a metrological framework. In this paper we compare the result of analysis performed by two packages, VNA Tools II and Multiport Measurement Software version 4 (MMS4). Both packages claim to perform uncertainty analyses fully compliant to the Guide of expression of uncertainty in measurement, but following completely different approaches. We organized a comparison by performing, with both packages, analyses of the very same datasets. These have been generated by real measurements on passive standards with a commercial vector network analyzer. Results of the comparison give consistency of the uncertainty analyses performed by the software packages, which can be therefore considered equivalent and mutually validated.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C.4.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 810.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
810.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2593586
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo