Personal cloud storage services are data-intensive applications already producing a significant share of Internet traffic. Several solutions offered by different companies attract more and more people. However, little is known about each service capabilities, architecture and -- most of all -- performance implications of design choices. This paper presents a methodology to study cloud storage services. We apply our methodology to compare 5 popular offers, revealing different system architectures and capabilities. The implications on performance of different designs are assessed executing a series of benchmarks. Our results show no clear winner, with all services suffering from some limitations or having potential for improvement. In some scenarios, the upload of the same file set can take seven times more, wasting twice as much capacity. Our methodology and results are useful thus as both benchmark and guideline for system design.
Benchmarking personal cloud storage / Drago, Idilio; Bocchi, Enrico; Mellia, Marco; Herman, Slatman; Aiko, Pras. - STAMPA. - (2013), pp. 205-212. (Intervento presentato al convegno ACM IMC'13 - Internet Measurement Conference tenutosi a Barcelona, SP nel October 2013) [10.1145/2504730.2504762].
Benchmarking personal cloud storage
DRAGO, IDILIO;BOCCHI, ENRICO;MELLIA, Marco;
2013
Abstract
Personal cloud storage services are data-intensive applications already producing a significant share of Internet traffic. Several solutions offered by different companies attract more and more people. However, little is known about each service capabilities, architecture and -- most of all -- performance implications of design choices. This paper presents a methodology to study cloud storage services. We apply our methodology to compare 5 popular offers, revealing different system architectures and capabilities. The implications on performance of different designs are assessed executing a series of benchmarks. Our results show no clear winner, with all services suffering from some limitations or having potential for improvement. In some scenarios, the upload of the same file set can take seven times more, wasting twice as much capacity. Our methodology and results are useful thus as both benchmark and guideline for system design.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| imc13paper92.pdf accesso aperto 
											Tipologia:
											1. Preprint / submitted version [pre- review]
										 
											Licenza:
											
											
												Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
												
												
												
											
										 
										Dimensione
										224.35 kB
									 
										Formato
										Adobe PDF
									 | 224.35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri | 
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2519105
			
		
	
	
	
			      	Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
