Among the most recent bibliometric indicators for normalizing the differences among fields of science in terms of citation behaviour, Kosmulski (J Informetr 5(3):481–485, 2011) proposed the NSP (number of successful paper) index. According to the authors, NSP deserves much attention for its great simplicity and immediate meaning— equivalent to those of the h-index—while it has the disadvantage of being prone to manipulation and not very efficient in terms of statistical significance. In the first part of the paper, we introduce the success-index, aimed at reducing the NSP-index’s limitations, although requiring more computing effort. Next, we present a detailed analysis of the success-index from the point of view of its operational properties and a comparison with the h-index’s ones. Particularly interesting is the examination of the success-index scale of measurement, which is much richer than the h-index’s. This makes success-index much more versatile for different types of analysis—e.g., (cross-field) comparisons of the scientific output of (1) individual researchers, (2) researchers with different seniority, (3) research institutions of different size, (4) scientific journals, etc.
|Titolo:||The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2012|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||10.1007/s11192-011-0570-z|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|
File in questo prodotto:
|Scientometrics Success-index_revised_.pdf||2. Post-print||PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati||Visibile a tuttiVisualizza/Apri|
|Scientometrics v.92, n.3, 2012 pp.621-641 success-index FF DM LM MG.pdf||2. Post-print||Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto||Administrator Richiedi una copia|