The growing diffusion of generative AI in higher education has shifted attention toward learners' capacity to formulate, evaluate, and refine their interactions with AI systems. From a Knowledge Building perspective, AI functions as a mediating artefact for collaborative knowledge construction, provided learners exercise epistemic agency, the capacity to identify problems, set inquiry goals, and advance knowledg, both individually and collectively. Equally central is metacognitive regulation: planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s own cognitive processes becomes critical when students must assess AI outputs against authoritative sources and revise strategies accordingly. Given limited research on this intersection, the study asks: How do metacognitive regulation and collective epistemic agency emerge during collaborative prompt formulation, evaluation, and revision in AI-supported higher education?

Collaborative AI Prompting as a Driver of Metacognitive Awareness and Epistemic Agency in Higher Education / Barpi, F., Miranda, A., Saliceto, L., Ciasullo, A., Casalino, G., Taibi, D.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2026), pp. 389-391. (8th International Conference Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online 28-30 September 2026, Cagliari, Italy Cagliari (Italia) 28-30 September 2026).

Collaborative AI Prompting as a Driver of Metacognitive Awareness and Epistemic Agency in Higher Education

Fabrizio Barpi;
2026

Abstract

The growing diffusion of generative AI in higher education has shifted attention toward learners' capacity to formulate, evaluate, and refine their interactions with AI systems. From a Knowledge Building perspective, AI functions as a mediating artefact for collaborative knowledge construction, provided learners exercise epistemic agency, the capacity to identify problems, set inquiry goals, and advance knowledg, both individually and collectively. Equally central is metacognitive regulation: planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s own cognitive processes becomes critical when students must assess AI outputs against authoritative sources and revise strategies accordingly. Given limited research on this intersection, the study asks: How do metacognitive regulation and collective epistemic agency emerge during collaborative prompt formulation, evaluation, and revision in AI-supported higher education?
2026
978-88-99978-69-3
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
barpi.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 125.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
125.52 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3016152