Accurately modeling wind farm performance in complex atmospheric flows remains a challenge. This paper presents the modeling results of the American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN) wind farm benchmark, a collaborative effort involving 16 research groups from academia and industry within the International Energy Agency Wind Technology Collaboration Programme Task 57. The study evaluates a diverse suite of simulation tools, ranging from fast-running engineering wake models to high-fidelity large-eddy simulations, against a diurnal case study observed during the AWAKEN campaign. The benchmark utilized a three-phase structure to progressively assess model performance as observational data availability increased. Initial blind predictions showed that higher-fidelity models did not uniformly outperform simpler simulation tools in terms of aggregate error metrics; however, this largely reflects differences in inflow strategy rather than wake physics fidelity – simpler models directly ingested high-quality observations, while higher-fidelity models were tasked with predicting the inflow from coarser reanalysis boundary conditions. A distinct spatial bias was observed where models struggled to resolve the interplay between a low-level jet, wakes, and terrain-induced flow acceleration. In subsequent phases, access to progressively richer observational data enabled model refinement that reduced mean absolute error by up to 40 %; however, these gains primarily reflect state-conditioned calibration to a well-observed atmospheric state. Overall, the study demonstrates that inflow characterization defines a lower bound on achievable model accuracy that is independent of wake modeling fidelity – a finding with direct implications for pre-construction energy assessment workflows. While the limited ability to resolve local terrain-flow interactions under single-day conditions represents a recognized constraint, the findings on wake modeling and real-world validation still provide valuable guidance for model application and future benchmark design.
The AWAKEN wind farm benchmark – Part 2: Modeling results / Bodini, N., Moriarty, P., Thedin, R., Doubrawa, P., Archer, C., Blaylock, M., Bottasso, C., Carmo, B., Cheung, L., Dubreuil, C., Floors, R., Herges, T., Houck, D., Kanjari, A., Kaul, C.M., Kelley, C., Ru, L.i., Lundquist, J.K., Major, D., Nguyen, A.K., et al.. - In: WIND ENERGY SCIENCE. - ISSN 2366-7443. - 11:8(2026), pp. 3107-3135. [10.5194/wes-11-3107-2026]
The AWAKEN wind farm benchmark – Part 2: Modeling results
Archer, Cristina;
2026
Abstract
Accurately modeling wind farm performance in complex atmospheric flows remains a challenge. This paper presents the modeling results of the American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN) wind farm benchmark, a collaborative effort involving 16 research groups from academia and industry within the International Energy Agency Wind Technology Collaboration Programme Task 57. The study evaluates a diverse suite of simulation tools, ranging from fast-running engineering wake models to high-fidelity large-eddy simulations, against a diurnal case study observed during the AWAKEN campaign. The benchmark utilized a three-phase structure to progressively assess model performance as observational data availability increased. Initial blind predictions showed that higher-fidelity models did not uniformly outperform simpler simulation tools in terms of aggregate error metrics; however, this largely reflects differences in inflow strategy rather than wake physics fidelity – simpler models directly ingested high-quality observations, while higher-fidelity models were tasked with predicting the inflow from coarser reanalysis boundary conditions. A distinct spatial bias was observed where models struggled to resolve the interplay between a low-level jet, wakes, and terrain-induced flow acceleration. In subsequent phases, access to progressively richer observational data enabled model refinement that reduced mean absolute error by up to 40 %; however, these gains primarily reflect state-conditioned calibration to a well-observed atmospheric state. Overall, the study demonstrates that inflow characterization defines a lower bound on achievable model accuracy that is independent of wake modeling fidelity – a finding with direct implications for pre-construction energy assessment workflows. While the limited ability to resolve local terrain-flow interactions under single-day conditions represents a recognized constraint, the findings on wake modeling and real-world validation still provide valuable guidance for model application and future benchmark design.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
wes-11-3107-2026_mini.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.43 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.43 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3015869
