Managing water resources in mountainous regions depends heavily on reliable Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and Snow Height (HS) data, yet these variables remain difficult to track at scale. This study evaluates three machine learning architectures (XGBoost, U-Net and SegFormer) for the joint estimation of SWE and HS variations from Sentinel-1 InSAR data over the Italian Alps, using the IT-SNOW reanalysis as reference. SegFormer achieves the best results on both targets, with an MAE of 10.391 cm for HS and 27.113 mm w.e. for SWE and the lowest variability across initializations. A feature sensitivity analysis shows that including all available features does not guarantee the lowest error, with model- and task-specific sensitivities. Spatial metrics (R2, Pearson’s r) separate the three architectures far more clearly than mean error (MAE, RMSE) does, and decomposing the error per window attributes most of it to a systematic offset in the estimated mean variation rather than to the spatial pattern.
Learning Regional Snow Water Equivalent and Snow Height Variations from Sentinel-1 InSAR Acquisitions / Barco, L., Innocenti, L., Bartoli, B., Rossi, C., Arnaudo, E., Garza, P.. - In: IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS. - ISSN 1545-598X. - Early Access:(In corso di stampa). [10.1109/LGRS.2026.3735343]
Learning Regional Snow Water Equivalent and Snow Height Variations from Sentinel-1 InSAR Acquisitions
Barco,Luca;Innocenti,Lorenzo;Bartoli,Bianca;Arnaudo,Edoardo;Garza,Paolo
In corso di stampa
Abstract
Managing water resources in mountainous regions depends heavily on reliable Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and Snow Height (HS) data, yet these variables remain difficult to track at scale. This study evaluates three machine learning architectures (XGBoost, U-Net and SegFormer) for the joint estimation of SWE and HS variations from Sentinel-1 InSAR data over the Italian Alps, using the IT-SNOW reanalysis as reference. SegFormer achieves the best results on both targets, with an MAE of 10.391 cm for HS and 27.113 mm w.e. for SWE and the lowest variability across initializations. A feature sensitivity analysis shows that including all available features does not guarantee the lowest error, with model- and task-specific sensitivities. Spatial metrics (R2, Pearson’s r) separate the three architectures far more clearly than mean error (MAE, RMSE) does, and decomposing the error per window attributes most of it to a systematic offset in the estimated mean variation rather than to the spatial pattern.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
InSAR_SWE_IEEE_GRSL_pdf.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.11 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.11 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3015597
