Throughout the twentieth century, mega-events have long been framed as a one-off spectacle that cannot be readily duplicated. Recently, several cities have begun organizing these mega projects in quick succession. Until now, research has explored little of the planning dynamics between multiple events, their wider impacts and legacy. By providing a historic overview covering Beijing’s 2008 and 2022 Olympic Games, we explore the relationships between mega-event planning, delivery, and legacy. Through this investigation, we examine the long-term spatial visions in regional, urban, and architectural scales across the two events. We then identify continuity or changes in approaches, in particular with reference to the re-use of mega-event infrastructures and facilities and how these affect the legacies of the events. Our findings show a clear policy learning amid shifting urban objectives, with the scale of intervention expanded from the metropolitan to macro-regional.

Beijing 2008–2022: fast-evolving policy, planning, and architectural approaches to the Summer and Winter Olympic Games / Du, X., Jones, Z.M., Ponzini, D., Lu, S.. - In: PLANNING PERSPECTIVES. - ISSN 0266-5433. - (2026), pp. 1-23. [10.1080/02665433.2026.2723768]

Beijing 2008–2022: fast-evolving policy, planning, and architectural approaches to the Summer and Winter Olympic Games

Zachary M. Jones;
2026

Abstract

Throughout the twentieth century, mega-events have long been framed as a one-off spectacle that cannot be readily duplicated. Recently, several cities have begun organizing these mega projects in quick succession. Until now, research has explored little of the planning dynamics between multiple events, their wider impacts and legacy. By providing a historic overview covering Beijing’s 2008 and 2022 Olympic Games, we explore the relationships between mega-event planning, delivery, and legacy. Through this investigation, we examine the long-term spatial visions in regional, urban, and architectural scales across the two events. We then identify continuity or changes in approaches, in particular with reference to the re-use of mega-event infrastructures and facilities and how these affect the legacies of the events. Our findings show a clear policy learning amid shifting urban objectives, with the scale of intervention expanded from the metropolitan to macro-regional.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3015595
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo