This study examines how EU EMAS-registered organizations prioritize environmental goals, monitor environmental indicators, and report achievement outcomes. Based on a Computer-Assisted Web Interview survey of 297 organizations from different sectors and countries, the analysis focuses on self-reported goal achievement rather than objectively verified environmental performance. Nearly all surveyed organizations reported having set environmental goals (98.7%), with energy reduction and regulatory compliance among the most frequently prioritized areas. In this sample, higher self-reported goal achieve-ment was correlated with higher perceived importance of environmental goals. The asso-ciation between the perceived importance of monitoring and self-reported achievement was less consistent and varied by environmental aspect. The findings suggest that EMAS organizations use structured goal-setting and monitoring practices, but reported achieve-ment levels vary by sector, country, and organizational priorities. Given the cross-sec-tional and self-reported nature of the data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. No claims of directional or causal effects are made.
Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey / Castelluccio, S., Comoglio, C., Fiore, S., Matuszak-Flejszman, A., Paliwoda, B.. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - ELETTRONICO. - 18:15(2026). [10.3390/su18157644]
Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey
Stefano, Castelluccio;Claudio, Comoglio;Silvia, Fiore;
2026
Abstract
This study examines how EU EMAS-registered organizations prioritize environmental goals, monitor environmental indicators, and report achievement outcomes. Based on a Computer-Assisted Web Interview survey of 297 organizations from different sectors and countries, the analysis focuses on self-reported goal achievement rather than objectively verified environmental performance. Nearly all surveyed organizations reported having set environmental goals (98.7%), with energy reduction and regulatory compliance among the most frequently prioritized areas. In this sample, higher self-reported goal achieve-ment was correlated with higher perceived importance of environmental goals. The asso-ciation between the perceived importance of monitoring and self-reported achievement was less consistent and varied by environmental aspect. The findings suggest that EMAS organizations use structured goal-setting and monitoring practices, but reported achieve-ment levels vary by sector, country, and organizational priorities. Given the cross-sec-tional and self-reported nature of the data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. No claims of directional or causal effects are made.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
sustainability-18-07644.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
700.97 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
700.97 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3013602
