This study examines how EU EMAS-registered organizations prioritize environmental goals, monitor environmental indicators, and report achievement outcomes. Based on a Computer-Assisted Web Interview survey of 297 organizations from different sectors and countries, the analysis focuses on self-reported goal achievement rather than objectively verified environmental performance. Nearly all surveyed organizations reported having set environmental goals (98.7%), with energy reduction and regulatory compliance among the most frequently prioritized areas. In this sample, higher self-reported goal achieve-ment was correlated with higher perceived importance of environmental goals. The asso-ciation between the perceived importance of monitoring and self-reported achievement was less consistent and varied by environmental aspect. The findings suggest that EMAS organizations use structured goal-setting and monitoring practices, but reported achieve-ment levels vary by sector, country, and organizational priorities. Given the cross-sec-tional and self-reported nature of the data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. No claims of directional or causal effects are made.

Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey / Castelluccio, S., Comoglio, C., Fiore, S., Matuszak-Flejszman, A., Paliwoda, B.. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - ELETTRONICO. - 18:15(2026). [10.3390/su18157644]

Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey

Stefano, Castelluccio;Claudio, Comoglio;Silvia, Fiore;
2026

Abstract

This study examines how EU EMAS-registered organizations prioritize environmental goals, monitor environmental indicators, and report achievement outcomes. Based on a Computer-Assisted Web Interview survey of 297 organizations from different sectors and countries, the analysis focuses on self-reported goal achievement rather than objectively verified environmental performance. Nearly all surveyed organizations reported having set environmental goals (98.7%), with energy reduction and regulatory compliance among the most frequently prioritized areas. In this sample, higher self-reported goal achieve-ment was correlated with higher perceived importance of environmental goals. The asso-ciation between the perceived importance of monitoring and self-reported achievement was less consistent and varied by environmental aspect. The findings suggest that EMAS organizations use structured goal-setting and monitoring practices, but reported achieve-ment levels vary by sector, country, and organizational priorities. Given the cross-sec-tional and self-reported nature of the data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. No claims of directional or causal effects are made.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3013602
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo