This study develops and numerically assesses finite-element-informed machine-learning surrogates for predicting five classical failure indices in a composite wing-box substructure containing prescribed intralaminar stiffness degradation. A damage-oriented database is generated by varying damage position, extent, and intensity over rib, skin, and spar regions of an equivalent-orthotropic finite-element model. Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and a multilayer perceptron are trained and evaluated using a common data-partitioning and cross-validation framework, with separate attention to the upper end of the failure-index range. The tree-based ensembles consistently outperform the neural-network benchmark; the Max Stress index is the most accurately reproduced, whereas the Christensen index and spar-dominated cases remain more difficult, particularly for failure-index values above 0.7. The results establish the feasibility of rapid numerical screening within the adopted model assumptions.
Element-level finite-element-informed machine-learning surrogates for failure-index prediction in a composite wing box with intralaminar damage / Magliacano, D., Letizia, A., Di Palo, S., Alecci, M., Bazzani, M.. - In: AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1270-9638. - ELETTRONICO. - 177 D:(2026), pp. 1-19. [10.1016/j.ast.2026.112878]
Element-level finite-element-informed machine-learning surrogates for failure-index prediction in a composite wing box with intralaminar damage
Dario Magliacano;
2026
Abstract
This study develops and numerically assesses finite-element-informed machine-learning surrogates for predicting five classical failure indices in a composite wing-box substructure containing prescribed intralaminar stiffness degradation. A damage-oriented database is generated by varying damage position, extent, and intensity over rib, skin, and spar regions of an equivalent-orthotropic finite-element model. Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and a multilayer perceptron are trained and evaluated using a common data-partitioning and cross-validation framework, with separate attention to the upper end of the failure-index range. The tree-based ensembles consistently outperform the neural-network benchmark; the Max Stress index is the most accurately reproduced, whereas the Christensen index and spar-dominated cases remain more difficult, particularly for failure-index values above 0.7. The results establish the feasibility of rapid numerical screening within the adopted model assumptions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1270963826012563-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3012149
