The major global challenges of climate change, environmental degradation, and resource scarcity have gained centrality in policymaking and academia, with a growing body of research exploring the interlinkages among economic growth, trade, environmental outcomes, and policy interventions. These analyses and theirresults draw fundamentally on the definitions used to consider a firm, product, or process “green,” and on the related operationalization. Despite a proliferation of empirical approaches, however, the literature lacks a comprehensive overview of firm-level sustainability indicators. This article addresses this gap by systematically reviewing existing definitions and the most frequently employed indicators Our analysis shows that, according to prevailing definitions of greenness, a firm can be considered green either because it is purpose-sustainable, meaning that it primarily serves an environmental purpose, or because it is process-sustainable, meaning that its activities reduce or prevent negative environmental impacts even if environmental goals are not its primary purpose. We further classify the existing firmlevel sustainability indicators into three groups: (1) product-level indicators; (2) resource and pollution management indicators; and (3) investment, innovation, and commitment indicators. Our findings aim to support researchers in selecting indicators that align with specific research objectives and dimensions of sustainability under investigation

Measuring Firm Greenness: A Comprehensive Review of Corporate Sustainability Indicators / Pupo, Maria Laura; D'Ambrosio, Anna. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS. - ISSN 1467-6419. - (2026). [10.1111/joes.70077]

Measuring Firm Greenness: A Comprehensive Review of Corporate Sustainability Indicators

Pupo, Maria Laura;D'Ambrosio Anna
2026

Abstract

The major global challenges of climate change, environmental degradation, and resource scarcity have gained centrality in policymaking and academia, with a growing body of research exploring the interlinkages among economic growth, trade, environmental outcomes, and policy interventions. These analyses and theirresults draw fundamentally on the definitions used to consider a firm, product, or process “green,” and on the related operationalization. Despite a proliferation of empirical approaches, however, the literature lacks a comprehensive overview of firm-level sustainability indicators. This article addresses this gap by systematically reviewing existing definitions and the most frequently employed indicators Our analysis shows that, according to prevailing definitions of greenness, a firm can be considered green either because it is purpose-sustainable, meaning that it primarily serves an environmental purpose, or because it is process-sustainable, meaning that its activities reduce or prevent negative environmental impacts even if environmental goals are not its primary purpose. We further classify the existing firmlevel sustainability indicators into three groups: (1) product-level indicators; (2) resource and pollution management indicators; and (3) investment, innovation, and commitment indicators. Our findings aim to support researchers in selecting indicators that align with specific research objectives and dimensions of sustainability under investigation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Journal of Economic Surveys - 2026 - Pupo - Measuring Firm Greenness A Comprehensive Review of Corporate Sustainability.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 665.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
665.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3008708