This paper presents a comparative study of two sets of techniques for identifying primary and secondary resonances in nonlinear dynamic systems: experimental continuation and broadband data-based modeling. The former refers to methods integrating control and continuation processes to empirically derive the bifurcation diagram of a nonlinear system. These approaches do not require a model, but the need for a controller introduces complexity in the experiments. Conversely, broadband data-based modeling uses wide spectrum excitation data to develop a nonlinear model of the system. Proper model validation is crucial in this process to ensure accurate results. In this work, the comparison is carried out using an electronic Duffing system. Results show that both approaches can accurately identify primary and secondary resonances and highlight advantages and disadvantages of each.
Identification of primary and secondary resonances: experimental continuation and broadband data-based modeling / Anastasio, Dario; Marchesiello, Stefano; Raze, Ghislain; Kerschen, Gaëtan. - ELETTRONICO. - (2025). ( NODYCON 2025 - The Fourth International Nonlinear Dynamics Conference Hoboken (USA) 22-25 June 2025).
Identification of primary and secondary resonances: experimental continuation and broadband data-based modeling
Anastasio, Dario;Marchesiello Stefano;
2025
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of two sets of techniques for identifying primary and secondary resonances in nonlinear dynamic systems: experimental continuation and broadband data-based modeling. The former refers to methods integrating control and continuation processes to empirically derive the bifurcation diagram of a nonlinear system. These approaches do not require a model, but the need for a controller introduces complexity in the experiments. Conversely, broadband data-based modeling uses wide spectrum excitation data to develop a nonlinear model of the system. Proper model validation is crucial in this process to ensure accurate results. In this work, the comparison is carried out using an electronic Duffing system. Results show that both approaches can accurately identify primary and secondary resonances and highlight advantages and disadvantages of each.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3005792
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
