In industrial applications, the growing relevance of large-scale metrology brings forth the challenge of achieving highly precise measurements (± 0.1 mm) using solutions that are both cost-efficient and easy to operate. This paper explores the performance of Markerless Photogrammetry (MP) compared to established technologies like Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Laser Trackers (LT), and Marker-based Photogrammetry (MbP) to evaluate MP’s potential in industrial tasks. Experimental results show that MP achieved mean distance errors between 0.26 and 0.94 mm, higher than those obtained with CMM (< 0.003 mm) and LT (< 0.05 mm), but slightly superior to MbP in large-volume scenarios(< 0.15 mm). While CMM and LT deliver exceptional accuracy, their practicality is often restricted by the cost and limitations in large-volume parts. MbP stands out for its extensive range, adaptability, and user-friendliness, though it is confined to capturing sparse data and does not achieve the same level of accuracy as conventional methods. Although MP demonstrates lower accuracy with respect to CMM and LT, the results highlight its potential as a practical alternative for scenarios where affordability and ease of use outweigh the drawbacks of long computational requirements (up to 5 h for complex models).

Exploring markerless close-range photogrammetry for industrial inspection applications: a feasibility study / Prieto, Inés; Herrera, Imanol; Lingua, Andrea Maria; Puerto, Pablo; Leizea, Ibai. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0268-3768. - ELETTRONICO. - (2025). [10.1007/s00170-025-16788-x]

Exploring markerless close-range photogrammetry for industrial inspection applications: a feasibility study

Lingua, Andrea Maria;
2025

Abstract

In industrial applications, the growing relevance of large-scale metrology brings forth the challenge of achieving highly precise measurements (± 0.1 mm) using solutions that are both cost-efficient and easy to operate. This paper explores the performance of Markerless Photogrammetry (MP) compared to established technologies like Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Laser Trackers (LT), and Marker-based Photogrammetry (MbP) to evaluate MP’s potential in industrial tasks. Experimental results show that MP achieved mean distance errors between 0.26 and 0.94 mm, higher than those obtained with CMM (< 0.003 mm) and LT (< 0.05 mm), but slightly superior to MbP in large-volume scenarios(< 0.15 mm). While CMM and LT deliver exceptional accuracy, their practicality is often restricted by the cost and limitations in large-volume parts. MbP stands out for its extensive range, adaptability, and user-friendliness, though it is confined to capturing sparse data and does not achieve the same level of accuracy as conventional methods. Although MP demonstrates lower accuracy with respect to CMM and LT, the results highlight its potential as a practical alternative for scenarios where affordability and ease of use outweigh the drawbacks of long computational requirements (up to 5 h for complex models).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3005168
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo