Mobile multicam photogrammetry systems offer a number of advantages over other 3d imaging modalities, including rapid acquisition speed, low cost sensors, and the availability of mature open-source software systems for photogrammetric alignment and reconstruction.. Through a number of case studies we compare the Looq, a home-grown GPS enabled multi-cam mobile mapping system, to colocated models from terrestrial photogrammetry, aerial photogrammetry, two terrestrial LiDAR systems, and two SLAM LiDAR systems. We evaluate these systems across varied urban and natural environments, in GPS enabled and denied environments, tight interior spaces, and open landscapes in Europe and North America. The comparative performance of these systems is described qualitatively and quantitatively.

A Multi-Modal Evaluation of GPS Assisted Rapid Multi-Cam Photogrammetry / Klingspon, Jonathan; Mcavoy, Scott; Chiabrando, Filiberto; Tanduo, Beatrice; Martino, Alessio; Rissolo, Dominique; Kuester, Falko. - ELETTRONICO. - XLVIII-M-9-2025:(2025), pp. 741-747. (Intervento presentato al convegno 30th CIPA Symposium “Heritage Conservation from Bits: From Digital Documentation to Data-driven Heritage Conservation” tenutosi a Seoul (ROK) nel 25-29 August 2025) [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-9-2025-741-2025].

A Multi-Modal Evaluation of GPS Assisted Rapid Multi-Cam Photogrammetry

Scott McAvoy;Filiberto Chiabrando;Beatrice Tanduo;Alessio Martino;
2025

Abstract

Mobile multicam photogrammetry systems offer a number of advantages over other 3d imaging modalities, including rapid acquisition speed, low cost sensors, and the availability of mature open-source software systems for photogrammetric alignment and reconstruction.. Through a number of case studies we compare the Looq, a home-grown GPS enabled multi-cam mobile mapping system, to colocated models from terrestrial photogrammetry, aerial photogrammetry, two terrestrial LiDAR systems, and two SLAM LiDAR systems. We evaluate these systems across varied urban and natural environments, in GPS enabled and denied environments, tight interior spaces, and open landscapes in Europe and North America. The comparative performance of these systems is described qualitatively and quantitatively.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3004121
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo