Mobile multicam photogrammetry systems offer a number of advantages over other 3d imaging modalities, including rapid acquisition speed, low cost sensors, and the availability of mature open-source software systems for photogrammetric alignment and reconstruction.. Through a number of case studies we compare the Looq, a home-grown GPS enabled multi-cam mobile mapping system, to colocated models from terrestrial photogrammetry, aerial photogrammetry, two terrestrial LiDAR systems, and two SLAM LiDAR systems. We evaluate these systems across varied urban and natural environments, in GPS enabled and denied environments, tight interior spaces, and open landscapes in Europe and North America. The comparative performance of these systems is described qualitatively and quantitatively.

A Multi-Modal Evaluation of GPS Assisted Rapid Multi-Cam Photogrammetry / Klingspon, Jonathan; Mcavoy, Scott; Chiabrando, Filiberto; Tanduo, Beatrice; Martino, Alessio; Rissolo, Dominique; Kuester, Falko. - In: INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE PHOTOGRAMMETRY, REMOTE SENSING AND SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCES. - ISSN 2194-9034. - ELETTRONICO. - XLVIII-M-9-2025:(2025), pp. 741-747. [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-9-2025-741-2025]

A Multi-Modal Evaluation of GPS Assisted Rapid Multi-Cam Photogrammetry

Scott McAvoy;Filiberto Chiabrando;Beatrice Tanduo;Alessio Martino;
2025

Abstract

Mobile multicam photogrammetry systems offer a number of advantages over other 3d imaging modalities, including rapid acquisition speed, low cost sensors, and the availability of mature open-source software systems for photogrammetric alignment and reconstruction.. Through a number of case studies we compare the Looq, a home-grown GPS enabled multi-cam mobile mapping system, to colocated models from terrestrial photogrammetry, aerial photogrammetry, two terrestrial LiDAR systems, and two SLAM LiDAR systems. We evaluate these systems across varied urban and natural environments, in GPS enabled and denied environments, tight interior spaces, and open landscapes in Europe and North America. The comparative performance of these systems is described qualitatively and quantitatively.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-9-2025-741-2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3004121