The paper contributes to the debate on the holistic sustainability assessment of real estate projects, integrating economic, financial, environmental, and social aspects. A methodological study is presented to support decision-making processes involving the preferability ranking of alternative investment scenarios: new building production vs. retrofitting the existing stock, in the context of urban transformation interventions. The study integrates life cycle approaches by introducing the social components besides the economic and environmental ones. Firstly, a composite unidimensional (monetary) indicator calculation is illustrated. The sustainability components are internalized in the NPV calculation through a Discounted Cash-Flow Analysis (DCFA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are suggested to assess the economic and environmental impacts, and the Social Return on Investment (SROI) to assess the intervention’s extra-financial value. Secondly, a methodology based on multicriteria techniques is proposed. The Hierarchical Analytical Process (AHP) model is suggested to harmonize various performance indicators. Focus is placed on the criticalities emerging in both the methodological approaches, while highlighting the relevance of multidimensional approaches in decision-making processes and for supporting urban policies and urban resilience.

A Holistic Sustainability Evaluation for Heritage Upcycling vs. Building Construction Projects / Fregonara, Elena; Senatore, Chiara; Coscia, Cristina; Pasquino, Francesca. - In: REAL ESTATE. - ISSN 2813-8090. - CD-ROM. - 2:4(2025), pp. 1-22. [10.3390/realestate2040017]

A Holistic Sustainability Evaluation for Heritage Upcycling vs. Building Construction Projects.

Fregonara, Elena;Senatore, Chiara;Coscia, Cristina;Pasquino, Francesca
2025

Abstract

The paper contributes to the debate on the holistic sustainability assessment of real estate projects, integrating economic, financial, environmental, and social aspects. A methodological study is presented to support decision-making processes involving the preferability ranking of alternative investment scenarios: new building production vs. retrofitting the existing stock, in the context of urban transformation interventions. The study integrates life cycle approaches by introducing the social components besides the economic and environmental ones. Firstly, a composite unidimensional (monetary) indicator calculation is illustrated. The sustainability components are internalized in the NPV calculation through a Discounted Cash-Flow Analysis (DCFA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are suggested to assess the economic and environmental impacts, and the Social Return on Investment (SROI) to assess the intervention’s extra-financial value. Secondly, a methodology based on multicriteria techniques is proposed. The Hierarchical Analytical Process (AHP) model is suggested to harmonize various performance indicators. Focus is placed on the criticalities emerging in both the methodological approaches, while highlighting the relevance of multidimensional approaches in decision-making processes and for supporting urban policies and urban resilience.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
realestate-02-00017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.36 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3003791