Casablanca, Morocco’s largest Atlantic port city, faces increasing exposure to floods, drought, and other risks that align with legacies of urban transformations carried out during the colonial period. This study examines how early-20th-century interventions—including the canalization and burial of the Oued Bouskoura, extensive coastal reclamation, and the implementation of rigid zoning—were associated with a reconfiguration of the city’s hydrology and coincide with persistent socio-spatial inequalities. Using historical cartography, archival sources, and GIS-based overlays of colonial-era plans with contemporary hazard maps, the analysis reveals an indicative spatial correlation between today’s high-risk zones and areas transformed under the Protectorate, with the medina emerging as one of the most vulnerable districts. While previous studies have examined either colonial planning in architectural or contemporary climate risks through technical and governance lenses, this article illuminates historically conditioned relationships and long-term associations for urban resilience. In doing so, it empirically maps spatial associations and conceptually argues for reframing heritage not only as cultural memory but as a climate resource, illustrating how suppressed vernacular systems may inform adaptation strategies. This interdisciplinary approach provides a novel contribution to postcolonial city research, climate adaptation and heritage studies by proposing a historically conscious framework for resilience planning.

Postcolonial Resilience in Casablanca: Colonial Legacies and Climate Vulnerability / Bolca, Pelin. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - (2025). [10.3390/su17198656]

Postcolonial Resilience in Casablanca: Colonial Legacies and Climate Vulnerability

PELIN BOLCA
2025

Abstract

Casablanca, Morocco’s largest Atlantic port city, faces increasing exposure to floods, drought, and other risks that align with legacies of urban transformations carried out during the colonial period. This study examines how early-20th-century interventions—including the canalization and burial of the Oued Bouskoura, extensive coastal reclamation, and the implementation of rigid zoning—were associated with a reconfiguration of the city’s hydrology and coincide with persistent socio-spatial inequalities. Using historical cartography, archival sources, and GIS-based overlays of colonial-era plans with contemporary hazard maps, the analysis reveals an indicative spatial correlation between today’s high-risk zones and areas transformed under the Protectorate, with the medina emerging as one of the most vulnerable districts. While previous studies have examined either colonial planning in architectural or contemporary climate risks through technical and governance lenses, this article illuminates historically conditioned relationships and long-term associations for urban resilience. In doing so, it empirically maps spatial associations and conceptually argues for reframing heritage not only as cultural memory but as a climate resource, illustrating how suppressed vernacular systems may inform adaptation strategies. This interdisciplinary approach provides a novel contribution to postcolonial city research, climate adaptation and heritage studies by proposing a historically conscious framework for resilience planning.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3003510
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo