This paper compares two multi-objective optimization strategies for spiral-grooved dynamic gas thrust bearings. The first optimization is carried out using an analytical model, which is valid under the assumption of a high number of grooves. The second one is carried out by using a numerical model based on a finite difference (FD) technique, which is valid also in case of a limited number of grooves. The FD model was validated with data from the literature, then it was compared with the analytical model. The multi-objective optimization is based on a genetic algorithm and it is aimed at maximizing the load-carrying capacity (LCC) of the thrust bearing while minimizing its friction torque. It was found that the analytical model overestimates both the friction torque and the load capacity compared to the FD model, and that the Pareto front optimizations reveal almost identical trends in the optimized parameters.
Pareto Front Optimization for Spiral-Grooved High-Speed Thrust Bearings: Comparison Between Analytical and Numerical Models / Colombo, Federico; Goti, Edoardo; Lentini, Luigi. - In: MACHINES. - ISSN 2075-1702. - 13:9(2025). [10.3390/machines13090832]
Pareto Front Optimization for Spiral-Grooved High-Speed Thrust Bearings: Comparison Between Analytical and Numerical Models
Colombo, Federico;Goti, Edoardo;Lentini, Luigi
2025
Abstract
This paper compares two multi-objective optimization strategies for spiral-grooved dynamic gas thrust bearings. The first optimization is carried out using an analytical model, which is valid under the assumption of a high number of grooves. The second one is carried out by using a numerical model based on a finite difference (FD) technique, which is valid also in case of a limited number of grooves. The FD model was validated with data from the literature, then it was compared with the analytical model. The multi-objective optimization is based on a genetic algorithm and it is aimed at maximizing the load-carrying capacity (LCC) of the thrust bearing while minimizing its friction torque. It was found that the analytical model overestimates both the friction torque and the load capacity compared to the FD model, and that the Pareto front optimizations reveal almost identical trends in the optimized parameters.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| machines-13-00832.pdf accesso aperto 
											Tipologia:
											2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
										 
											Licenza:
											
											
												Creative commons
												
												
													
													
													
												
												
											
										 
										Dimensione
										2.42 MB
									 
										Formato
										Adobe PDF
									 | 2.42 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri | 
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3003149
			
		
	
	
	
			      	