This study experimentally investigates Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) as structured porous media for concentrated solar power systems. Two mock-up planar solar receivers with different TPMS lattices, Diamond and SplitP, were fabricated using Additive Manufacturing. Testing was conducted within the SFERA III project, funded by the EU, utilizing a solar simulator facility at IMDEA Energy Institute in Madrid, Spain. Thermal performance was evaluated under varying mass flow rates and heat flux levels, using synthetic air as the working fluid. Results show superior performance of the SplitP lattice over the Diamond lattice, exhibiting higher heat absorption, lower heat loss, and improved thermal and exergetic efficiencies. SplitP achieved a maximum thermal efficiency of approximately 70 %, compared to 60 % for Diamond, and an exergetic efficiency of approximately 12 %, compared to 8 % for Diamond.

Experimental investigation of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces for high-temperature solar receivers / Mortazavi, A.; Ávila-Marín, A. L.; Ebadi, H.; Gajetti, E.; Piatti, C.; Marocco, L.; Savoldi, L.. - In: CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 2214-157X. - 60:(2024). [10.1016/j.csite.2024.104771]

Experimental investigation of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces for high-temperature solar receivers

A. Mortazavi;H. Ebadi;E. Gajetti;C. Piatti;L. Savoldi
2024

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) as structured porous media for concentrated solar power systems. Two mock-up planar solar receivers with different TPMS lattices, Diamond and SplitP, were fabricated using Additive Manufacturing. Testing was conducted within the SFERA III project, funded by the EU, utilizing a solar simulator facility at IMDEA Energy Institute in Madrid, Spain. Thermal performance was evaluated under varying mass flow rates and heat flux levels, using synthetic air as the working fluid. Results show superior performance of the SplitP lattice over the Diamond lattice, exhibiting higher heat absorption, lower heat loss, and improved thermal and exergetic efficiencies. SplitP achieved a maximum thermal efficiency of approximately 70 %, compared to 60 % for Diamond, and an exergetic efficiency of approximately 12 %, compared to 8 % for Diamond.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2214157X24008025-MINE.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.65 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2992973