The proposed contribution draws on the results of the ESPON METRO and COMPASS projects (ESPON 2018, 2021). First, the paper surveys the various institutional models established in the European Union (EU) countries to handle metropolitan governance. Then, it develops a classification pivoted around four variables: (i) the governance model, (ii) the degree of correspondence between the geographical scope of the institutional action and the actual functional phenomena and (iii) the spatial development and planning competences provided to the institution and (iv) the types of instruments they adopt to practice those competences. The results of the analysis constitute a preliminary compass to navigate metropolitan governance in the EU, as well as to reflect on the pros and cons of the institutional models in place in the different contexts.https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/article/view/1293
Metropolitan governance in the European Union. A classification of existing institutional models / Casavola, Domato; Cotella, Giancarlo; Janin Rivolin, Umberto; Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta. - ELETTRONICO. - 36:(2024). (Intervento presentato al convegno GAME CHANGER? Planning for just and sustainable urban regions tenutosi a Paris (FR) nel 8-12 July, 2024).
Metropolitan governance in the European Union. A classification of existing institutional models
Cotella, Giancarlo;Janin Rivolin, Umberto;Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta
2024
Abstract
The proposed contribution draws on the results of the ESPON METRO and COMPASS projects (ESPON 2018, 2021). First, the paper surveys the various institutional models established in the European Union (EU) countries to handle metropolitan governance. Then, it develops a classification pivoted around four variables: (i) the governance model, (ii) the degree of correspondence between the geographical scope of the institutional action and the actual functional phenomena and (iii) the spatial development and planning competences provided to the institution and (iv) the types of instruments they adopt to practice those competences. The results of the analysis constitute a preliminary compass to navigate metropolitan governance in the EU, as well as to reflect on the pros and cons of the institutional models in place in the different contexts.https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/article/view/1293File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
AESOP Annual Congress proceedings.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
86.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
86.38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2990398