The proposed contribution draws on the results of the ESPON METRO and COMPASS projects (ESPON 2018, 2021). First, the paper surveys the various institutional models established in the European Union (EU) countries to handle metropolitan governance. Then, it develops a classification pivoted around four variables: (i) the governance model, (ii) the degree of correspondence between the geographical scope of the institutional action and the actual functional phenomena and (iii) the spatial development and planning competences provided to the institution and (iv) the types of instruments they adopt to practice those competences. The results of the analysis constitute a preliminary compass to navigate metropolitan governance in the EU, as well as to reflect on the pros and cons of the institutional models in place in the different contexts.https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/article/view/1293

Metropolitan governance in the European Union. A classification of existing institutional models / Casavola, Domato; Cotella, Giancarlo; Janin Rivolin, Umberto; Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta. - ELETTRONICO. - 36:(2024). (Intervento presentato al convegno GAME CHANGER? Planning for just and sustainable urban regions tenutosi a Paris (FR) nel 8-12 July, 2024).

Metropolitan governance in the European Union. A classification of existing institutional models

Cotella, Giancarlo;Janin Rivolin, Umberto;Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta
2024

Abstract

The proposed contribution draws on the results of the ESPON METRO and COMPASS projects (ESPON 2018, 2021). First, the paper surveys the various institutional models established in the European Union (EU) countries to handle metropolitan governance. Then, it develops a classification pivoted around four variables: (i) the governance model, (ii) the degree of correspondence between the geographical scope of the institutional action and the actual functional phenomena and (iii) the spatial development and planning competences provided to the institution and (iv) the types of instruments they adopt to practice those competences. The results of the analysis constitute a preliminary compass to navigate metropolitan governance in the EU, as well as to reflect on the pros and cons of the institutional models in place in the different contexts.https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/article/view/1293
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AESOP Annual Congress proceedings.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 86.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
86.38 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2990398