The "so-called" Seveso III directive (Directive 2012/18/EU) impose to plant managers to perform a detailed risk assessment and to adopt adequate protection measures in the case their facility is included among those considered subjected to Major Accident, i.e., if the amount of hazardous substances stocked and handled within it is superior to defined threshold limits. Fire risk evaluation needs to consider each plant's complexity and the different regulations and codes it is subjected to. Meanwhile, a thorough approach is required, which does not base itself uniquely on qualitative methods (such as checklists) or semi-quantitative (such as fire load-based approach) but should consider these latter as starting processes to develop a more comprehensive evaluation. Besides this, accident scenarios associated with chemical plants may differ significantly, according to the substances handled, the activities and processes implemented: Typically, they could range from small to medium scale in terms of consequences, depending on the impact on human operators and structures. Several "risk screening" methods exist, differing from their fields of applications and limitations, as detailed by Danzi et al. (2018). The SWandHI methodology was developed by Khan et al. (2001). It is a fast tool that allows to identify the most hazardous units in chemical process plants, underline the criticalities associated with different substances, processes, and operations, evaluate the effectiveness of the protection measures in place, compare the risk level attributed to different chemical processes, define the adequate additional measures to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. In this work, the SWandHI method (with the modifications proposed in Danzi et al. 2018) is adopted as a preliminary risk screening approach in the production departments of a fine chemicals production plant in Northern Italy, which is identified as a relevant case study due to the heterogeneity of substances and chemical processes available. This study aims to verify the applicability and effectiveness of SWandHI when adopted in the evaluation of fire risk of "medium-size" plants, or "just below" Seveso III thresholds facilities (which could be considered as a majority in Italy), and to identify the prevention and protection measures most suitable to be implemented in this context to mitigate the fire and explosion scenario. The risk assessment conducted in this work will contribute, with further applications, to: (a) the tuning and calibration of the SWandHI method to "medium" scale chemical industrial realities; (b) the definition of a standard procedure of fire and explosion risk screening through SWandHI; (c) the implementation of the validated method into the Italian fire risk regulations.

Fire and Explosion Risk Assessment: Application to the Fine Chemicals Industry / Danzi, E.; Fiorentini, Luca; Marmo, L.. - In: CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS. - ISSN 2283-9216. - ELETTRONICO. - 86:(2021), pp. 241-246. [10.3303/CET2186041]

Fire and Explosion Risk Assessment: Application to the Fine Chemicals Industry

Danzi E.;Fiorentini Luca;Marmo L.
2021

Abstract

The "so-called" Seveso III directive (Directive 2012/18/EU) impose to plant managers to perform a detailed risk assessment and to adopt adequate protection measures in the case their facility is included among those considered subjected to Major Accident, i.e., if the amount of hazardous substances stocked and handled within it is superior to defined threshold limits. Fire risk evaluation needs to consider each plant's complexity and the different regulations and codes it is subjected to. Meanwhile, a thorough approach is required, which does not base itself uniquely on qualitative methods (such as checklists) or semi-quantitative (such as fire load-based approach) but should consider these latter as starting processes to develop a more comprehensive evaluation. Besides this, accident scenarios associated with chemical plants may differ significantly, according to the substances handled, the activities and processes implemented: Typically, they could range from small to medium scale in terms of consequences, depending on the impact on human operators and structures. Several "risk screening" methods exist, differing from their fields of applications and limitations, as detailed by Danzi et al. (2018). The SWandHI methodology was developed by Khan et al. (2001). It is a fast tool that allows to identify the most hazardous units in chemical process plants, underline the criticalities associated with different substances, processes, and operations, evaluate the effectiveness of the protection measures in place, compare the risk level attributed to different chemical processes, define the adequate additional measures to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. In this work, the SWandHI method (with the modifications proposed in Danzi et al. 2018) is adopted as a preliminary risk screening approach in the production departments of a fine chemicals production plant in Northern Italy, which is identified as a relevant case study due to the heterogeneity of substances and chemical processes available. This study aims to verify the applicability and effectiveness of SWandHI when adopted in the evaluation of fire risk of "medium-size" plants, or "just below" Seveso III thresholds facilities (which could be considered as a majority in Italy), and to identify the prevention and protection measures most suitable to be implemented in this context to mitigate the fire and explosion scenario. The risk assessment conducted in this work will contribute, with further applications, to: (a) the tuning and calibration of the SWandHI method to "medium" scale chemical industrial realities; (b) the definition of a standard procedure of fire and explosion risk screening through SWandHI; (c) the implementation of the validated method into the Italian fire risk regulations.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fire-and-Explosion-Risk-Assessment-Application-to-the-Fine-Chemicals-IndustryChemical-Engineering-Transactions.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Paper
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 844.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
844.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2959703