In 2015, the United Nations established the Agenda 2030 for sustainable development, addressing the major challenges the world faces and introducing the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). How are countries performing in their challenge toward sustainable development? We address this question by treating countries and Goals as a complex bipartite network. While network science has been used to unveil the interconnections among the Goals, it has been poorly exploited to rank countries for their achievements. In this work, we show that the network representation of the countries-SDGs relations as a bipartite system allows one to recover aggregate scores of countries’ capacity to cope with SDGs as the solutions of a network’s centrality exercise. While the Goals are all equally important by definition, interesting differences self-emerge when non-standard centrality metrics, borrowed from economic complexity, are adopted. Innovation and Climate Action stand as contrasting Goals to be accomplished, with countries facing the well-known trade-offs between economic and environmental issues even in addressing the Agenda. In conclusion, the complexity of countries’ paths toward sustainable development cannot be fully understood by resorting to a single, multipurpose ranking indicator, while multi-variable analyses shed new light on the present and future of sustainable development.

A network approach to rank countries chasing sustainable development / Sciarra, Carla; Chiarotti, Guido; Ridolfi, Luca; Laio, Francesco. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:1(2021), p. 15441. [10.1038/s41598-021-94858-2]

A network approach to rank countries chasing sustainable development

Carla Sciarra;Luca Ridolfi;Francesco Laio
2021

Abstract

In 2015, the United Nations established the Agenda 2030 for sustainable development, addressing the major challenges the world faces and introducing the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). How are countries performing in their challenge toward sustainable development? We address this question by treating countries and Goals as a complex bipartite network. While network science has been used to unveil the interconnections among the Goals, it has been poorly exploited to rank countries for their achievements. In this work, we show that the network representation of the countries-SDGs relations as a bipartite system allows one to recover aggregate scores of countries’ capacity to cope with SDGs as the solutions of a network’s centrality exercise. While the Goals are all equally important by definition, interesting differences self-emerge when non-standard centrality metrics, borrowed from economic complexity, are adopted. Innovation and Climate Action stand as contrasting Goals to be accomplished, with countries facing the well-known trade-offs between economic and environmental issues even in addressing the Agenda. In conclusion, the complexity of countries’ paths toward sustainable development cannot be fully understood by resorting to a single, multipurpose ranking indicator, while multi-variable analyses shed new light on the present and future of sustainable development.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021 - a network_compressed-prima parte.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: prima parte
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 186.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
186.35 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2021 - a network_compressed-seconda parte (2).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: seconda parte
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 366.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
366.83 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2021 - a network_compressed-terza parte.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: terza parte
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 525.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
525.85 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2916192