Positive impacts of car-sharing, such as reductions in car ownership, congestion, vehicle-miles-traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively analyzed. However, these benefits are not fully effective if car-sharing subtracts travel demand from existing sustainable modes. This paper evaluates substitution rates of car-sharing against private cars and public transport using a Random Forest classifier and Binomial Logit model. The models were calibrated and validated using a stated-preference travel survey and applied to a revealed-preference survey, both administered to a representative sample of the population living in Turin (Italy). Results of the two models show that the predictive power of both models is comparable, albeit the Logit model tends to estimate predictions with a higher reliability and the Random Forest model produces higher positive switches towards car-sharing. However, results from both models suggest that the substitution rate of private cars is, on average, almost five times that of public transport.
Evaluating car-sharing switching rates from traditional transport means through logit models and Random Forest classifiers / Ceccato, R.; Chicco, A.; Diana, M.. - In: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0308-1060. - STAMPA. - 44:2(2021), pp. 160-175. [10.1080/03081060.2020.1868084]
Evaluating car-sharing switching rates from traditional transport means through logit models and Random Forest classifiers
Ceccato R.;Chicco A.;Diana M.
2021
Abstract
Positive impacts of car-sharing, such as reductions in car ownership, congestion, vehicle-miles-traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively analyzed. However, these benefits are not fully effective if car-sharing subtracts travel demand from existing sustainable modes. This paper evaluates substitution rates of car-sharing against private cars and public transport using a Random Forest classifier and Binomial Logit model. The models were calibrated and validated using a stated-preference travel survey and applied to a revealed-preference survey, both administered to a representative sample of the population living in Turin (Italy). Results of the two models show that the predictive power of both models is comparable, albeit the Logit model tends to estimate predictions with a higher reliability and the Random Forest model produces higher positive switches towards car-sharing. However, results from both models suggest that the substitution rate of private cars is, on average, almost five times that of public transport.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Evaluating car sharing switching rates from traditional transport means.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Versione editoriale
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.7 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.7 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
AM_Evaluating car-sharing switching rates from traditional transport means.pdf
Open Access dal 05/06/2022
Descrizione: Bozza finale post referaggio
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
401.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
401.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
AOM_Evaluating car-sharing switching rates from traditional transport means.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Bozza finale pre referaggio
Tipologia:
1. Preprint / submitted version [pre- review]
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
399.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
399.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2892768