The reconstruction of the displacement field of a structure (shape sensing) has become crucial for the Structural Health Monitoring of aerospace structures and for the progress of the recently developing morphing structures. As a consequence, shape sensing techniques based on discrete surface strains measurements have seen a consistent expansion in the last few years. In this paper, the three main shape sensing methods, the Modal Method, the Ko’s displacements theory and the inverse Finite Element Method, are presented. The most recent and also novel improvements are discussed and added to the methods’ formulations. Then, the three methods are numerically applied to a complex aerospace structure such as that of a composite wing box experiencing bending and twisting deformations. For the first time, a detailed investigation on the optimal strain sensors configuration is performed for all the three techniques simultaneously. Finally, the methods’ performances, in terms of accuracy of the reconstruction and of number of required sensors, are compared. The three methods show different characteristics that make them suitable for different applications, depending on the level of accuracy and the number of strain information required. The iFEM is proven to be the more accurate but the more demanding in terms of required sensors; the Ko’s displacement theory is capable of giving a rough estimation of the displacement field, but requires a small amount of sensors; the Modal Method represents a trade-off between the other two in terms of accuracy and number of sensors required.

Composite wing box deformed-shape reconstruction based on measured strains: Optimization and comparison of existing approaches / Esposito, Marco; Gherlone, Marco. - In: AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1270-9638. - ELETTRONICO. - 99:(2020), p. 105758. [10.1016/j.ast.2020.105758]

Composite wing box deformed-shape reconstruction based on measured strains: Optimization and comparison of existing approaches

Esposito, Marco;Gherlone, Marco
2020

Abstract

The reconstruction of the displacement field of a structure (shape sensing) has become crucial for the Structural Health Monitoring of aerospace structures and for the progress of the recently developing morphing structures. As a consequence, shape sensing techniques based on discrete surface strains measurements have seen a consistent expansion in the last few years. In this paper, the three main shape sensing methods, the Modal Method, the Ko’s displacements theory and the inverse Finite Element Method, are presented. The most recent and also novel improvements are discussed and added to the methods’ formulations. Then, the three methods are numerically applied to a complex aerospace structure such as that of a composite wing box experiencing bending and twisting deformations. For the first time, a detailed investigation on the optimal strain sensors configuration is performed for all the three techniques simultaneously. Finally, the methods’ performances, in terms of accuracy of the reconstruction and of number of required sensors, are compared. The three methods show different characteristics that make them suitable for different applications, depending on the level of accuracy and the number of strain information required. The iFEM is proven to be the more accurate but the more demanding in terms of required sensors; the Ko’s displacement theory is capable of giving a rough estimation of the displacement field, but requires a small amount of sensors; the Modal Method represents a trade-off between the other two in terms of accuracy and number of sensors required.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020_AST_Shape_Sensing_Wingbox_Comparison_Numerical.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Published paper
Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.81 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.81 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2020_AST_Shape_Sensing_Wingbox_Comparison_Numerical_Draft.pdf

Open Access dal 05/02/2022

Descrizione: Accepted paper
Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.79 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2792879