This paper presents selected results from the first stage of DAYKE (Daylight Knowledge in Europe), a 3-phase project that investigates the knowledge on daylighting in buildings among architecture students and practitioners across Europe. Subjective judgements from 561 students from 8 architecture universities in the EU, collected through two surveys in 2018. The key findings are: (i) the spatial distribution of comfort and mood in the classrooms varied depending on sky conditions and distance from windows; (ii) the average daylight factor DFm showed a good agreement with subjective judgements on the amount of daylight in a space; (iii) experts and non-experts provided similar judgements on the perception of a daylit environment; (iv) a general lack of knowledge about daylighting metrics, regulations, assessment tools and software was highlighted. Furthermore a difficulty in implementing daylighting into the design practice is also identified.
A study about daylighting knowledge and education in Europe. Results from the first phase of the DAYKE project / Giuliani, F.; Sokol, N.; Lo Verso, V. R. M.; Viula, R.; Caffaro, F.; Paule, B.; Diakite, A.; Sutter, Y.. - In: ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW. - ISSN 0003-8628. - ELETTRONICO. - 64:1-2(2021), pp. 169-181. [10.1080/00038628.2019.1675042]
A study about daylighting knowledge and education in Europe. Results from the first phase of the DAYKE project
Lo Verso V. R. M.;
2021
Abstract
This paper presents selected results from the first stage of DAYKE (Daylight Knowledge in Europe), a 3-phase project that investigates the knowledge on daylighting in buildings among architecture students and practitioners across Europe. Subjective judgements from 561 students from 8 architecture universities in the EU, collected through two surveys in 2018. The key findings are: (i) the spatial distribution of comfort and mood in the classrooms varied depending on sky conditions and distance from windows; (ii) the average daylight factor DFm showed a good agreement with subjective judgements on the amount of daylight in a space; (iii) experts and non-experts provided similar judgements on the perception of a daylit environment; (iv) a general lack of knowledge about daylighting metrics, regulations, assessment tools and software was highlighted. Furthermore a difficulty in implementing daylighting into the design practice is also identified.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2-s2.0-85074329165.pdf
accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo pubblicato e registrato su scopus (versione precedente risultava pubblicato solo online)
Tipologia:
2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
4.35 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.35 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2772593