Archivio Istituzionale della RicercaIn the following, we look at how the different accessibility instruments presented in section 3 compare on the different aspects: background, conceptual framework and theoretical underpinnings, operational aspects, relevance for planning practice, strengths and limitations, and visualization. We identify, per item, significant similarities and differences and reflect on potential implications for the following steps of the Action.
Cross-analysis of the accessibility instruments / Bertolini, L; Halden, D; Iltanen, S; Pensa, Stefano; Santos, B. - In: COST Action TU1002 - Accessibility Instruments for Planning Practice / Hull A., Silva C., Bertolini L.. - STAMPA. - Bruxelles : COST Office, 2012, 2012. - ISBN 978-989-20-3187-3. - pp. 195-203
Cross-analysis of the accessibility instruments
PENSA, STEFANO;
2012
Abstract
In the following, we look at how the different accessibility instruments presented in section 3 compare on the different aspects: background, conceptual framework and theoretical underpinnings, operational aspects, relevance for planning practice, strengths and limitations, and visualization. We identify, per item, significant similarities and differences and reflect on potential implications for the following steps of the Action.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
12_TU1002_Bertolini_Halden_Iltanen_Pensa_Santos.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
280.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
280.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2643283
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo